Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Segment

Chemical tanker ships, 2025

1,674 chemical tanker ships reported to THETIS-MRV for 2025, emitting 9.2 Mt of CO₂. Efficiency is measured as g CO₂/t·nm.

The segment at a glance

Median ship
15.0
g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel per mile
80 kg
Median ship
Average speed
11.1 kn
Median ship, distance over hours at sea
Hours at sea
2,110
Median ship, EU-scope voyages (24% of the year)
CO₂ at berth
8.5%
Share emitted alongside in EU ports
Ships burning LNG
21
of 1,460 benchmarked

Operators

Who runs chemical tanker ships in EU trades, and how their fleets compare. Technical shows efficiency, speed and time at sea; commercial shows the allowance bill.

#Group
1Stolt Tankers BV56−4%14.58811.71,9106.2%–
2Synergy Marine15 companies, 8 in chemical tanker65−28%10.87911.91,4286.1%–
3FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED54−15%12.97610.62,1666.0%–
4Odfjell Management AS32−17%12.59912.62,0875.8%–
5TORM3 companies, 1 in chemical tanker59−48%7.98311.31,6145.3%–
6TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG28−19%12.18311.32,8546.9%–
7OSM Thome10 companies, 4 in chemical tanker38−35%9.78210.72,23410.0%2
8ASM Maritime BV21+4%15.77211.82,8648.5%–
9Christiania2 companies23+177%41.75410.04,0338.9%–
10Anglo-Eastern10 companies, 2 in chemical tanker35−15%12.86811.81,7807.1%1
11Ardmore / Anglo Ardmore2 companies19−24%11.48911.31,8859.1%–
12John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG14+175%41.45511.04,50510.1%–
13MTM Ship Management2 companies, 1 in chemical tanker25−12%13.26610.31,8936.7%–
14Suntech Ship management Pte Ltd19−32%10.27711.12,4736.2%–
15Utkilen AS12+123%33.55211.25,0569.4%–
16MOL7 companies, 3 in chemical tanker11−11%13.47210.52,8905.6%2
17Bahri Ship Management DMCC23−24%11.49812.01,2657.0%–
18Columbia Shipmanagement3 companies17−40%9.19711.11,8279.5%–
19BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.25+58%23.7895.03,42812.7%–
20YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi13+181%42.3659.04,0935.5%–
21d'Amico4 companies, 2 in chemical tanker13−39%9.210011.02,12310.0%–
22Songa Shipmanagement Ltd9+151%37.8939.53,45717.5%–
23Terntank Rederi A/S11+50%22.65511.24,43110.4%2
243M Shipping6+47%22.11188.84,08014.7%–
25Stodig Ship Management AS9+90%28.55712.14,0587.5%–

Operators with at least 3 ships in this segment. Figures cover their ships in this segment only, so a group active in several segments (MSC runs container and cruise ships) has its full total on the market page. Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership; tell us at info@navalyze.com if one is in the wrong group. Click a column to rank by it.

Efficiency by ship size

Bigger ships move a tonne of cargo for less fuel, so ships are compared within size bands. Each row is drawn against the segment median.

0.25×0.5×segment median2×4×
  • Q1: ~4,371 t39.2 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q2: ~11 kt21.4 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q3: ~17 kt15.2 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q4: ~25 kt11.5 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q5: ~35 kt8.16 g CO₂/t·nm

Q1 to Q5 split the fleet into fifths by average cargo carried, derived from the published ratios.

Who verifies the reports

Accredited verifiers check each ship's MRV report. Their share of the segment's ships and CO₂.

Share of CO₂Share of ships

How fuel is measured

Each ship's monitoring plan names one or more of the four MRV methods.

A · Bunker delivery notes
41%
Fuel bought, corrected by tank soundings
B · Bunker tank monitoring
57%
Tank readings on board
C · Flow meters
48%
Meters on the fuel lines to engines and boilers
D · Direct measurement
0%
CO₂ measured in the exhaust

Most common combinations

  • B + C30%
  • A29%
  • B22%
  • C7%
  • A + C7%
  • A + B + C3%
  • A + B2%

Share of 1,759 emission reports that name a method; a report can name several.

Notes

  • Medians and rankings use 1,460 full-year reports with fuel; part-year and zero-fuel reports count towards totals only.
  • THETIS reports time at sea on EU-scope voyages only, not time in port. CO₂ at berth is the closest measure of port activity it publishes.
  • Speed and distance are derived from the published ratios; THETIS has no distance column.