Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KGyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 19 |
| CO₂ emitted | 147 kt−1.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 54 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 10.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG41.4 (+175% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 14 | 41.4 | +175% | 55 | 11.0 | 4,505 | 10.1% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG44.0 (+453% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 4 | 44.0 | +453% | 48 | 10.5 | 3,969 | 13.4% | 2 |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG23.7 (+45% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 1 | 23.7 | +45% | 111 | 12.4 | 418 | 13.2% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | EnvService (19) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBERHART ESSBERGER | 9939802 | Oil tanker | 50.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +85% | 10.5 | 5,659 t | €277k |
| HEINRICH ESSBERGERLNG | 9939814 | Oil tanker | 44.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +64% | 10.6 | 5,885 t | €268k |
| LISELOTTE ESSBERGERLNG | 9939785 | Oil tanker | 43.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +61% | 10.5 | 5,974 t | €282k |
| JOHN T. ESSBERGER | 9939797 | Oil tanker | 40.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +49% | 10.2 | 5,837 t | €281k |
| HELGA ESSBERGER | 9172155 | Chemical tanker | 53.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +35% | 10.9 | 9,637 t | €493k |
| GISELA ESSBERGER | 9147734 | Chemical tanker | 51.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +32% | 10.5 | 9,248 t | €473k |
| CORAL ESSBERGER | 9504205 | Chemical tanker | 51.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +31% | 10.8 | 9,046 t | €451k |
| CUNO ESSBERGER | 9504190 | Chemical tanker | 50.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +29% | 10.5 | 10,063 t | €480k |
| ROLAND ESSBERGER | 9504217 | Chemical tanker | 47.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +22% | 11.2 | 9,132 t | €438k |
| AGNES ESSBERGER | 9327047 | Chemical tanker | 44.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +13% | 10.6 | 10,055 t | €500k |
| ANNETTE ESSBERGER | 9327059 | Chemical tanker | 43.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +10% | 10.7 | 9,906 t | €494k |
| UBENA | 9690078 | Container | 23.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +7% | 12.4 | 1,782 t | €39k |
| ELLEN ESSBERGER | 9272747 | Chemical tanker | 39.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +1% | 11.3 | 8,147 t | €392k |
| WILHELMINE ESSBERGER | 9295440 | Chemical tanker | 37.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −3% | 10.9 | 7,316 t | €295k |
| LISA ESSBERGER | 9295438 | Chemical tanker | 37.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −5% | 11.5 | 8,026 t | €367k |
| ANNELIESE ESSBERGER | 9295426 | Chemical tanker | 35.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −10% | 11.5 | 7,088 t | €333k |
| LIESEL ESSBERGER | 9272761 | Chemical tanker | 34.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −12% | 11.2 | 7,471 t | €353k |
| AMALIE ESSBERGER | 9314777 | Chemical tanker | 32.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −18% | 11.1 | 7,326 t | €367k |
| CAROLINE ESSBERGER | 9439151 | Chemical tanker | 31.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −19% | 11.2 | 9,727 t | €486k |
30 of 19 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.