Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Stodig Ship Management AS
Ships16
CO₂ emitted146 kt+50.8%
Fuel per mile62 kg/nm
Average speed12.2 kn
CO₂ at berth6.0%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Stodig Ship Management AS28.5 (+90%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Stodig Ship Management AS928.5+90%5712.14,0587.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

Ro-ro

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2

  • Stodig Ship Management AS121 (+27%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Stodig Ship Management AS4121+27%7112.25,3683.8%–
Segment median 95.20%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Stodig Ship Management ASDNV (13), Bureau Veritas (3)0%100%0%0%

Stodig Ship Management AS: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
TRANS IBERIA9170597Chemical tanker28.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+31%13.710,421 t€329k
TRANS TIND9594054Chemical tanker25.0 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+17%12.88,242 t€342k
TRANS EMERALD9295452Chemical tanker39.3 g CO₂/t·nm39.20%12.18,644 t€374k
TRANS SOL9348936Ro-ro149 g CO₂/t·nm161−7%12.417,619 t€408k
TRANS HAV9348948Ro-ro92.7 g CO₂/t·nm100−8%12.917,686 t€585k
TRANS EXETER9314753Chemical tanker35.4 g CO₂/t·nm39.2−10%12.18,240 t€357k
TRANS SEA9956927Chemical tanker18.8 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−12%11.47,337 t€268k
TRANS CATALONIA9176694Chemical tanker17.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−18%12.914,017 t€432k
TRANS ADRIATIC9263928Chemical tanker30.4 g CO₂/t·nm39.2−22%12.18,235 t€376k
TRANS CHEMICA9314715Chemical tanker30.2 g CO₂/t·nm39.2−23%11.06,962 t€334k
TRANS FJORD9956939Chemical tanker28.5 g CO₂/t·nm39.2−27%11.77,476 t€319k
SC CONNECTOR9131993Ro-ro52.8 g CO₂/t·nm100−47%11.112,716 t€609k
SEA-CARGO EXPRESS9358060Ro-ro150 g CO₂/t·nm297−49%12.810,895 t€465k

30 of 16 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.