Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Synergy Marineyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Synergy Marine | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 213 |
| CO₂ emitted | 2.0 Mt−1.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 118 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Synergy Marine10.0 (−39% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 13 | 10.0 | −39% | 271 | 15.5 | 3,037 | 0.9% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Synergy Marine9.6 (+21% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 66 | 9.6 | +21% | 104 | 11.2 | 2,621 | 9.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Synergy Marine10.8 (−28% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 65 | 10.8 | −28% | 79 | 11.9 | 1,428 | 6.1% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Synergy Marine6.7 (−15% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 64 | 6.7 | −15% | 84 | 10.8 | 1,458 | 3.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Synergy Marine21.8 (−39% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synergy Marine | 10 | 21.8 | −39% | 98 | 13.5 | 2,776 | 4.3% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
Synergy Marine: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SINAR MINAHASA | 9433860 | Oil tanker | 74.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +176% | 9.0 | 4,032 t | €132k |
| EVER GLOBE | 9786841 | Container | 34.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +137% | 16.7 | 88,488 t | €1.2m |
| SARIYAH | 9858773 | Chemical tanker | 36.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +70% | 9.1 | 3,691 t | €67k |
| BRO ANNA | 9344435 | Oil tanker | 40.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +50% | 9.1 | 9,279 t | €314k |
| STENA CONVOY | 9543110 | Chemical tanker | 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +49% | 11.3 | 2,516 t | €82k |
| HENRY MAERSK | 9399351 | Oil tanker | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +45% | 11.6 | 9,926 t | €338k |
| PERTAMINA GAS AMARYLLIS | 9895317 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +44% | 13.0 | 7,884 t | €209k |
| NCC QAMAR | 9387671 | Chemical tanker | 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +43% | 11.6 | 5,963 t | €223k |
| GAMSUNORO | 9677313 | Oil tanker | 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +42% | 11.5 | 17,404 t | €525k |
| NCC MAHA | 9387683 | Chemical tanker | 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +40% | 9.2 | 3,372 t | €110k |
| HAFNIA LIBRA | 9617959 | Chemical tanker | 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +40% | 10.2 | 4,830 t | €171k |
| SDTR ERICA | 9877872 | Bulk carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +33% | 9.8 | 2,048 t | €57k |
| EASTERN SPIRAEA | 9909754 | Oil tanker | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +29% | 10.3 | 5,524 t | €246k |
| BRO NISSUM | 9340623 | Oil tanker | 34.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +25% | 10.3 | 6,972 t | €312k |
| COREOCEAN OL | 9519212 | Bulk carrier | 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | +24% | 9.6 | 893 t | €24k |
| BUNUN WISDOM | 9628568 | Bulk carrier | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +24% | 11.2 | 2,398 t | €63k |
| BLUEFIN PEARL | 9397808 | Oil tanker | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +22% | 11.0 | 5,663 t | €161k |
| HENRIETTE MAERSK | 9399349 | Oil tanker | 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +21% | 11.9 | 10,243 t | €405k |
| EVER GREET | 9832729 | Container | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +21% | 16.4 | 69,182 t | €1.1m |
| GAS STELLA | 9765562 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +19% | 14.5 | 20,430 t | €135k |
| COURAGE | 9335056 | Chemical tanker | 13.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 11.5 | +19% | 11.2 | 6,091 t | €203k |
| BELLEVUE | 9431185 | Bulk carrier | 5.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +19% | 9.2 | 4,656 t | €122k |
| NORD ANTARES | 9933224 | Bulk carrier | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | +16% | 8.7 | 5,417 t | €172k |
| EVER GRADE | 9820855 | Container | 12.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +16% | 16.1 | 78,765 t | €1.2m |
| OPERA | 9804887 | Chemical tanker | 17.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +16% | 10.8 | 2,518 t | €77k |
| HOURAI MARU | 9796585 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 24.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 20.9 | +16% | 15.9 | 12,840 t | €550k |
| HULDA MAERSK | 9399363 | Oil tanker | 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +14% | 11.5 | 4,225 t | €91k |
| OM SINGAPORE | 9341433 | Oil tanker | 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +14% | 11.8 | 3,730 t | €113k |
| CL LIANYUNGANG | 9747302 | Bulk carrier | 5.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +14% | 11.1 | 9,779 t | €287k |
| KMARIN RESPECT | 9683001 | Oil tanker | 7.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +11% | 10.6 | 16,416 t | €587k |
30 of 249 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.