Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Bahri Ship Management DMCC
Ships37
CO₂ emitted205 kt+85.3%
Fuel per mile109 kg/nm
Average speed12.4 kn
CO₂ at berth5.8%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Bahri Ship Management DMCC11.4 (−24%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Bahri Ship Management DMCC2311.4−24%9812.01,2657.0%–
Segment median 15.00%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Bahri Ship Management DMCC4.0 (−50%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Bahri Ship Management DMCC54.0−50%18912.11,3005.4%–
Segment median 8.00%

Con-ro

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9

  • Bahri Ship Management DMCC11.2 (+13%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Bahri Ship Management DMCC611.2+13%10114.11,4113.4%–
Segment median 9.90%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Bahri Ship Management DMCC179 (+602%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Bahri Ship Management DMCC2179+602%8212.11,9015.3%–
Segment median 25.50%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Bahri Ship Management DMCC3.8 (−52%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Bahri Ship Management DMCC13.8−52%9310.75520.0%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Bahri Ship Management DMCCABS (37)24%84%100%0%

Bahri Ship Management DMCC: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
BAHRI DIRIYAH9498482General cargo267 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+951%13.97,035 t€218k
BAHRI RIYADH9695224General cargo89.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+253%10.54,873 t€145k
BAHRI HOFUF9620956Con-ro17.2 g CO₂/m³·nm9.9+73%14.58,742 t€276k
BAHRI ABHA9620944Con-ro16.0 g CO₂/m³·nm9.9+61%13.27,364 t€211k
NCC NASMA9459008Chemical tanker23.1 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+52%11.63,196 t€108k
NCC QASSIM9306811Chemical tanker22.1 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+45%11.71,948 t€67k
NCC HUDA9399272Chemical tanker11.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+40%12.68,193 t€253k
NCC DANAH9419541Chemical tanker15.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+35%11.95,130 t€183k
NCC NOOR9399260Chemical tanker10.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+33%11.38,367 t€259k
NCC AMAL9411317Chemical tanker15.3 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+33%11.42,961 t€92k
NCC SAMA9480150Chemical tanker15.0 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+31%11.32,364 t€93k
NCC NAJEM9459022Chemical tanker15.0 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+30%12.46,060 t€227k
RAWAN9845104Chemical tanker10.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+24%11.98,421 t€250k
FATIMAH9917830Chemical tanker17.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+15%11.3982 t€30k
BAHRI JEDDAH9626522Con-ro11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm9.9+15%14.65,686 t€158k
NCC SHAMS9459010Chemical tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+15%12.04,839 t€145k
NCC SAFA9411329Chemical tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+15%12.012,243 t€420k
BAHRI YANBU9626534Con-ro11.1 g CO₂/m³·nm9.9+12%13.67,796 t€245k
SANAM9858486Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+11%12.64,804 t€142k
FARIDA9845099Chemical tanker8.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+7%12.22,892 t€83k
ZAHRA9917866Chemical tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+4%11.83,779 t€130k
RENAD9917816Chemical tanker11.7 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+2%12.77,834 t€240k
SHADEN9779848Oil tanker4.6 g CO₂/t·nm4.60%12.16,360 t€189k
BAHRI TABUK9620968Con-ro9.9 g CO₂/m³·nm9.90%14.53,366 t€95k
BAHRI JAZAN9620970Con-ro9.6 g CO₂/m³·nm9.9−3%14.54,856 t€136k
YAQUT9917878Chemical tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−4%12.04,686 t€157k
MARIA9917828Chemical tanker7.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2−8%12.35,156 t€149k
AMWAJ9917892Chemical tanker10.6 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−8%11.74,341 t€148k
NCC REEM9459034Chemical tanker10.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−9%12.03,002 t€109k
FARHAH9484742Oil tanker4.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.6−13%11.411,232 t€302k

30 of 37 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.