Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

ASM Maritime BVyour view

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

	ASM Maritime BV
Ships	40
CO₂ emitted	418 kt+22.1%
Fuel per mile	105 kg/nm
Average speed	12.0 kn
CO₂ at berth	5.4%
Ships burning LNG	0
Main segment	Container

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

ASM Maritime BV15.7 (−4% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
ASM Maritime BV	13	15.7	−4%	164	12.8	2,868	3.4%	–
Segment median		16.3	0%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

ASM Maritime BV15.7 (+4% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
ASM Maritime BV	21	15.7	+4%	72	11.8	2,864	8.5%	–
Segment median		15.0	0%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

ASM Maritime BV6.0 (−23% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
ASM Maritime BV	5	6.0	−23%	81	9.5	1,394	5.1%	–
Segment median		7.9	0%

Ro-ro

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2

ASM Maritime BV250 (+162% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
ASM Maritime BV	1	250	+162%	97	14.6	1,463	1.6%	–
Segment median		95.2	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
ASM Maritime BV	Verifavia (40)	55%	48%	0%	0%

ASM Maritime BV: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
BLUE ROSE	9335915	Chemical tanker	23.9 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	+57%	12.6	7,630 t	€244k
RED DIAMOND	9331713	Bulk carrier	13.4 g CO₂/t·nm	9.5	+42%	10.7	4,251 t	€123k
MSC ANCHORAGE	9619440	Container	14.1 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+37%	15.2	40,250 t	€1.4m
CHEM SINGAPORE	9705768	Chemical tanker	28.3 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	+33%	11.9	7,767 t	€253k
CHEM ORCHARD	9937983	Chemical tanker	17.6 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	+15%	12.0	9,135 t	€321k
MSC ALBANY	9619438	Container	11.5 g CO₂/t·nm	10.3	+11%	14.3	35,494 t	€1.0m
CHEM BROADWAY	9938004	Chemical tanker	12.8 g CO₂/t·nm	11.5	+11%	11.8	2,646 t	€96k
MSC ALTAMIRA	9619426	Container	14.9 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	+4%	14.9	10,105 t	€133k
MAERSK PANGANI	9786097	Container	14.9 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	+4%	13.6	10,818 t	€346k
MISTRAL EXPLORER	9624770	Chemical tanker	15.8 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	+3%	11.0	9,503 t	€309k
CHEM RAMBLAS	9937995	Chemical tanker	11.9 g CO₂/t·nm	11.5	+3%	13.1	8,175 t	€269k
GREEN POLE	9866005	Container	22.8 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	+3%	9.4	13,273 t	€697k
JACOB OLDENDORFF	9844203	Bulk carrier	4.9 g CO₂/t·nm	4.8	+1%	7.4	4,256 t	€137k
CHEM SIRIUS	9558397	Chemical tanker	15.2 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	0%	12.0	9,133 t	€278k
CALI	9631101	Container	21.6 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−3%	12.3	13,097 t	€398k
CHEM HOUSTON	9705720	Chemical tanker	20.6 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−3%	12.5	5,622 t	€217k
CHEM ROTTERDAM	9640140	Chemical tanker	20.1 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−6%	12.3	7,048 t	€229k
CHEM NEW ORLEANS	9705756	Chemical tanker	14.3 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	−6%	11.7	8,936 t	€277k
CHEM AMSTERDAM	9640138	Chemical tanker	14.3 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	−6%	11.6	10,934 t	€337k
LISA	9418652	Container	13.4 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	−7%	12.2	15,303 t	€442k
MH ADAGIO	9916977	Bulk carrier	4.5 g CO₂/t·nm	4.8	−7%	10.7	4,393 t	€117k
JENS OLDENDORFF	9852028	Bulk carrier	6.0 g CO₂/t·nm	6.6	−8%	8.8	1,525 t	€41k
CHEM SILICON	9829681	Chemical tanker	13.7 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	−10%	11.2	5,458 t	€159k
CHEM TAURUS	9477505	Chemical tanker	13.4 g CO₂/t·nm	15.2	−12%	12.1	9,755 t	€304k
CHEM COBALT	9740770	Chemical tanker	18.3 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−14%	11.7	10,246 t	€327k
MH ARPEGGIO	9916965	Bulk carrier	6.8 g CO₂/t·nm	8.0	−15%	11.2	2,373 t	€64k
TREASURE	9184859	Ro-ro	250 g CO₂/t·nm	297	−16%	14.6	6,401 t	€160k
LORRAINE	9311763	Container	18.3 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−17%	14.2	16,682 t	€95k
CHEM MERCURY	9815276	Chemical tanker	17.5 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−18%	11.5	7,018 t	€229k
SHIJING	9348663	Container	18.0 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−19%	13.1	43,140 t	€1.3m

30 of 40 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.