Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MSC Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| MSC Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 571 |
| CO₂ emitted | 13.9 Mt+1.7% |
| Fuel per mile | 223 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 59 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- MSC Group14.3 (−12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 536 | 14.3 | −12% | 217 | 12.9 | 2,665 | 4.0% | 57 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Cruise
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 521
- MSC Group363 (−30% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 20 | 363 | −30% | 351 | 14.4 | 4,431 | 13.5% | 2 |
| Segment median | 521 | 0% |
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- MSC Group442 (−22% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- MSC Group675 (+167% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 4 | 442 675 freight | −22% +167% freight | 166 | 14.4 | 3,185 | 6.2% | – |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- MSC Group72.6 (−24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 5 | 72.6 | −24% | 113 | 10.1 | 3,571 | 6.9% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- MSC Group22.5 (−11% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 3 | 22.5 | −11% | 68 | 8.0 | 3,523 | 7.4% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- MSC Group86.9 (+57% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 2 | 86.9 | +57% | 127 | 14.9 | 647 | 0.9% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- MSC Group5.3 (−32% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 1 | 5.3 | −32% | 102 | 8.8 | 1,617 | 3.6% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | DNV (551), Bureau Veritas (20) | 19% | 59% | 84% | 0% |
MSC Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPLORA I | 9869875 | Cruise | 1,179 g CO₂/pax·nm | 521 | +126% | 12.1 | 34,354 t | €1.5m |
| EXPLORA II | 9869887 | Cruise | 1,161 g CO₂/pax·nm | 521 | +123% | 12.2 | 39,774 t | €1.6m |
| MSC RUBY | 9502960 | Container | 36.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +65% | 15.2 | 16,429 t | €460k |
| MSC MELANI III | 9399741 | Container | 36.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +65% | 13.2 | 27,226 t | €827k |
| MSC MARYLENA II | 9169031 | Container | 36.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +63% | 10.0 | 21,655 t | €825k |
| MSC INGY | 9755945 | Container | 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +61% | 15.0 | 15,305 t | €451k |
| MSC BETTINA | 9399038 | Container | 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +54% | 14.3 | 21,297 t | €712k |
| MSC NICOLE X | 9214898 | Container | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +53% | 13.5 | 48,558 t | €1.5m |
| MSC ASLI | 9162631 | Container | 33.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +52% | 8.8 | 17,660 t | €690k |
| MSC JEONGMIN | 9720471 | Container | 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +51% | 15.0 | 56,456 t | €1.9m |
| MSC CAITLIN II | 9169043 | Container | 33.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +49% | 10.4 | 18,028 t | €678k |
| MSC TURKIYE | 9931288 | Container | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +49% | 11.4 | 14,906 t | €443k |
| MSC MIA SUMMER II | 9169067 | Container | 32.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +48% | 10.2 | 22,740 t | €992k |
| MSC TOKYO | 9318046 | Container | 15.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +47% | 14.0 | 32,831 t | €482k |
| MSC EDITH II | 9169029 | Container | 32.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +47% | 9.1 | 19,034 t | €698k |
| MSC SYDNEY VI | 9200677 | Container | 21.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +46% | 16.7 | 13,328 t | €366k |
| MSC VEGA | 9465265 | Container | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +45% | 13.4 | 40,267 t | €1.3m |
| MSC BRUNELLA | 9702106 | Container | 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +44% | 14.3 | 31,100 t | €992k |
| MSC ARCHIMIDIS VIII | 9315379 | Container | 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +44% | 14.0 | 11,610 t | €181k |
| MSC TERESA | 9469560 | Container | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +42% | 15.9 | 37,158 t | €1.1m |
| MSC DILETTA | 9897004 | Container | 14.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +41% | 15.3 | 18,423 t | €560k |
| MSC EMANUELA | 9399052 | Container | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +41% | 14.3 | 70,877 t | €2.0m |
| MSC NEW HAVEN | 9293777 | Container | 14.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +41% | 14.5 | 28,523 t | €903k |
| MSC SAGITTARIUS F | 9491616 | Container | 62.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +41% | 8.8 | 12,206 t | €397k |
| MSC DANIELA | 9399002 | Container | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 12.6 | 20,854 t | €630k |
| MSC ESTHI | 9304411 | Container | 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +39% | 14.0 | 52,961 t | €1.7m |
| MSC TRACY V | 9295177 | Container | 20.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +39% | 12.3 | 21,698 t | €656k |
| MSC BREMERHAVEN V | 9313967 | Container | 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +39% | 12.5 | 28,495 t | €903k |
| MSC SUSANNA | 9290543 | Container | 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +38% | 14.6 | 60,215 t | €1.9m |
| MSC VERACRUZ V | 9287924 | Container | 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +38% | 13.6 | 12,986 t | €374k |
30 of 571 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.