Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MSC Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| MSC Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 513 |
| CO₂ emitted | 13.7 Mt |
| Fuel per mile | 233 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 15 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- MSC Group14.2 (−19% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 478 | 14.2 | −19% | 226 | 12.7 | 2,872 | 3.8% | 13 |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Passenger
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 618
- MSC Group379 (−39% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 20 | 379 | −39% | 370 | 15.2 | 3,879 | 13.2% | 2 |
| Segment median | 618 | 0% |
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 547
- MSC Group4,352 (+696% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 233
- MSC Group759 (+226% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 4 | 4,352 759 freight | +696% +226% freight | 147 | 15.8 | 6,279 | 8.0% | – |
| Segment median | 547 233 freight | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5
- MSC Group77.2 (−21% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 4 | 77.2 | −21% | 116 | 9.0 | 4,227 | 7.7% | – |
| Segment median | 97.5 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- MSC Group52.1 (+171% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 4 | 52.1 | +171% | 71 | 8.1 | 2,347 | 8.5% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3
- MSC Group65.2 (+18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 2 | 65.2 | +18% | 133 | 14.3 | 1,689 | 1.3% | – |
| Segment median | 55.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- MSC Group6.4 (−20% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | 1 | 6.4 | −20% | 114 | 10.0 | 2,486 | 1.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC Group | DNV (493), Bureau Veritas (20) | 23% | 54% | 78% | 0% |
MSC Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNV ATLAS | 8712520 | Ro-pax | 4,352 g CO₂/pax·nm 759 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 547 233 | +696% +226% | 15.8 | 45,246 t | €814k |
| EXPLORA II | 9869887 | Passenger | 1,837 g CO₂/pax·nm | 618 | +197% | 13.4 | 12,443 t | €302k |
| EXPLORA I | 9869875 | Passenger | 1,813 g CO₂/pax·nm | 618 | +193% | 12.2 | 29,292 t | €718k |
| MSC ASSUNTA III | 9243590 | Container | 44.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +104% | 5.9 | 9,508 t | €77k |
| MSC EDITH II | 9169029 | Container | 43.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +98% | 10.6 | 22,797 t | €428k |
| MSC CAITLIN | 9169043 | Container | 40.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +85% | 11.0 | 23,937 t | €488k |
| MSC MELATILDE | 9404675 | Container | 36.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +66% | 15.2 | 13,458 t | €227k |
| MSC MIRELLA R | 9293179 | Container | 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +66% | 14.5 | 33,559 t | €608k |
| MSC MANON | 9435820 | Container | 76.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +62% | 6.9 | 10,527 t | €245k |
| MSC MIA SUMMER II | 9169067 | Container | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +61% | 11.4 | 21,483 t | €442k |
| MSC ASLI | 9162631 | Container | 34.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +60% | 9.3 | 18,466 t | €324k |
| MSC EMANUELA | 9399052 | Container | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +57% | 15.2 | 35,834 t | €586k |
| MSC CLORINDA | 9484429 | Container | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +56% | 15.3 | 29,926 t | €466k |
| MSC LENA F | 9347762 | Container | 72.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +54% | 7.8 | 9,385 t | €222k |
| MSC MARYLENA II | 9169031 | Container | 33.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +53% | 8.9 | 17,618 t | €458k |
| MSC VERACRUZ | 9287924 | Container | 22.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +53% | 12.7 | 12,531 t | €226k |
| MSC DEILA | 9461415 | Container | 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +51% | 14.9 | 36,583 t | €653k |
| MSC ROSA M | 9461398 | Container | 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +50% | 15.8 | 15,236 t | €235k |
| MSC ADRIANA II | 9169055 | Container | 32.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +48% | 11.3 | 23,284 t | €486k |
| MSC BEATRICE | 9399014 | Container | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +47% | 14.7 | 13,997 t | €217k |
| MSC DANIELA | 9399002 | Container | 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +47% | 12.7 | 17,464 t | €305k |
| MSC AVNI | 9756729 | Container | 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +46% | 15.2 | 19,063 t | €380k |
| MSC SARA ELENA | 9702261 | Container | 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +43% | 14.2 | 35,692 t | €636k |
| MSC FAIRFIELD | 9302633 | Container | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +41% | 14.4 | 44,623 t | €893k |
| MSC RUBY | 9502960 | Container | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 14.9 | 45,203 t | €756k |
| MSC VITA | 9702089 | Container | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +40% | 14.0 | 46,946 t | €833k |
| MSC LAURENCE | 9467419 | Container | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +38% | 13.8 | 50,593 t | €896k |
| MSC ANZU | 9710426 | Container | 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +38% | 14.5 | 43,568 t | €785k |
| MSC JOANNA | 9304435 | Container | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | +38% | 13.5 | 24,607 t | €573k |
| MSC MADISON II | 9231119 | Container | 29.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +37% | 6.8 | 11,012 t | €246k |
30 of 514 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.