Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Segment

Chemical tanker ships, 2024

1,489 chemical tanker ships reported to THETIS-MRV for 2024, emitting 9.1 Mt of CO₂. Efficiency is measured as g CO₂/t·nm.

The segment at a glance

Median ship
16.7
g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel per mile
81 kg
Median ship
Average speed
11.0 kn
Median ship, distance over hours at sea
Hours at sea
2,335
Median ship, EU-scope voyages (27% of the year)
CO₂ at berth
7.8%
Share emitted alongside in EU ports
Ships burning LNG
21
of 1,274 benchmarked

Operators

Who runs chemical tanker ships in EU trades, and how their fleets compare. Technical shows efficiency, speed and time at sea; commercial shows the allowance bill.

#Group
1FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED67−21%13.37910.52,1510.5%1
2Stolt Tankers BV63−11%14.98811.91,7107.8%2
3Synergy Marine14 companies, 6 in chemical tanker51−26%12.47711.21,5280.7%–
4TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG28−21%13.38211.52,8577.5%–
5OSM Thome8 companies, 4 in chemical tanker35−33%11.28310.72,2599.9%–
6Odfjell Management AS29−30%11.79812.52,0125.3%–
7Anglo-Eastern10 companies, 2 in chemical tanker34−12%14.77012.01,9207.0%1
8MTM Ship Management2 companies, 1 in chemical tanker30−19%13.56610.92,3667.0%–
9ASM Maritime BV23−7%15.57010.92,7334.4%–
10Anglo Ardmore Ship Management18−40%10.18511.72,2817.7%–
11Songa Shipmanagement Ltd15+100%33.5939.33,19216.2%–
12John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG14+154%42.55811.24,26711.7%–
13Utkilen AS13+111%35.35510.95,1897.6%–
14Navquim Ship Management15+123%37.4619.44,7489.3%–
15YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi13+190%48.56410.03,8366.6%–
16Unix Line Pte Ltd17−19%13.68511.12,1100.0%–
17BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.22+74%29.1808.32,35511.0%–
18Suntech Ship management Pte Ltd17−38%10.38311.02,0958.3%–
19MOL6 companies, 1 in chemical tanker10–––––0.0%–
203M Shipping6+19%19.91199.44,07917.3%–
21Terntank Rederi A/S9+49%25.05511.15,19210.8%4
22RAFFLES TECHNICAL SERVICES PTE LTD12−37%10.59111.42,1077.8%–
23IINO MARINE SERVICE CO., LTD.13–––––0.0%–
24d'Amico4 companies, 2 in chemical tanker110%16.710310.42,14513.6%–
25Columbia Shipmanagement3 companies17−50%8.38611.31,7236.3%–

Operators with at least 3 ships in this segment. Figures cover their ships in this segment only, so a group active in several segments (MSC runs container and cruise ships) has its full total on the market page. Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership; tell us at info@navalyze.com if one is in the wrong group. Click a column to rank by it.

Efficiency by ship size

Bigger ships move a tonne of cargo for less fuel, so ships are compared within size bands. Each row is drawn against the segment median.

0.25×0.5×segment median2×4×
  • Q1: ~4,339 t41.2 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q2: ~9,370 t23.6 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q3: ~16 kt16.5 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q4: ~24 kt12 g CO₂/t·nm
  • Q5: ~33 kt8.6 g CO₂/t·nm

Q1 to Q5 split the fleet into fifths by average cargo carried, derived from the published ratios.

Who verifies the reports

Accredited verifiers check each ship's MRV report. Their share of the segment's ships and CO₂.

Share of CO₂Share of ships

How fuel is measured

Each ship's monitoring plan names one or more of the four MRV methods.

A · Bunker delivery notes
46%
Fuel bought, corrected by tank soundings
B · Bunker tank monitoring
46%
Tank readings on board
C · Flow meters
39%
Meters on the fuel lines to engines and boilers
D · Direct measurement
0%
CO₂ measured in the exhaust

Most common combinations

  • A35%
  • B25%
  • B + C17%
  • C12%
  • A + C7%
  • A + B + C3%
  • A + B1%

Share of 1,530 emission reports that name a method; a report can name several.

Notes

  • Medians and rankings use 1,274 full-year reports with fuel; part-year and zero-fuel reports count towards totals only.
  • THETIS reports time at sea on EU-scope voyages only, not time in port. CO₂ at berth is the closest measure of port activity it publishes.
  • Speed and distance are derived from the published ratios; THETIS has no distance column.