Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Navquim Ship Managementyour view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	Navquim Ship Management
Ships	15
CO₂ emitted	122 kt
Fuel per mile	61 kg/nm
Average speed	9.4 kn
CO₂ at berth	9.3%
Ships burning LNG	0
Main segment	Chemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

Navquim Ship Management37.4 (+123% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Navquim Ship Management	15	37.4	+123%	61	9.4	4,748	9.3%	–
Segment median		16.7	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
Navquim Ship Management	DNV (15)	0%	100%	0%	0%

Navquim Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
NQ BELLIS	9192375	Chemical tanker	32.9 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	+39%	10.9	11,761 t	€280k
NQ LAELIA	9393383	Chemical tanker	53.4 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	+29%	8.8	7,002 t	€193k
NQ LILIUM	9393395	Chemical tanker	50.9 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	+23%	9.7	8,037 t	€218k
NQ VIOLA	9354571	Chemical tanker	45.6 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	+10%	9.4	7,383 t	€177k
NQ MAGNOLIA	9384162	Chemical tanker	25.7 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	+9%	10.4	11,997 t	€360k
NQ FREESIA	9829772	Chemical tanker	24.5 g CO₂/t·nm	23.7	+3%	9.5	7,509 t	€183k
NQ MILLA	9261516	Chemical tanker	40.1 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−3%	9.9	9,450 t	€221k
NQ CALIPSO	9138408	Chemical tanker	39.0 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−6%	8.1	8,741 t	€211k
NQ MORINA	9243382	Chemical tanker	38.3 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−7%	8.9	11,501 t	€265k
NQ VICTORIA	9344174	Chemical tanker	37.4 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−9%	10.1	6,587 t	€171k
NQ ROSA	9304318	Chemical tanker	35.4 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−14%	8.6	6,312 t	€175k
NQ TULIPA	9312406	Chemical tanker	34.4 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−17%	8.9	6,149 t	€145k
NQ ZINNIA	9150327	Chemical tanker	31.2 g CO₂/t·nm	41.2	−24%	9.5	8,160 t	€166k

30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.