Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Christiania Ship Managementyour view

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

	Christiania Ship Management
Ships	15
CO₂ emitted	104 kt−14.8%
Fuel per mile	56 kg/nm
Average speed	10.2 kn
CO₂ at berth	9.2%
Ships burning LNG	0
Main segment	Chemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

Christiania Ship Management37.7 (+151% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
Christiania Ship Management	15	37.7	+151%	56	10.2	4,089	9.2%	–
Segment median		15.0	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
Christiania Ship Management	DNV (15)	0%	100%	0%	0%

Christiania Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
MORINA THERESA	9243382	Chemical tanker	59.1 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+51%	10.3	8,542 t	€357k
NQ MILLA	9261516	Chemical tanker	45.6 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+16%	9.5	9,770 t	€403k
NQ LILIUM	9393395	Chemical tanker	45.6 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+16%	10.6	8,456 t	€380k
VIOLETA THERESA	9354571	Chemical tanker	43.3 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+10%	9.9	6,404 t	€279k
NQ TULIPA	9312406	Chemical tanker	42.5 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+8%	9.0	7,294 t	€334k
NQ LAELIA	9393383	Chemical tanker	41.9 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	+7%	9.9	8,042 t	€338k
NQ VICTORIA	9344174	Chemical tanker	39.2 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	0%	10.0	6,963 t	€301k
NQ ZINNIA	9150327	Chemical tanker	36.2 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	−8%	9.7	8,553 t	€303k
BELLIS THERESA	9192375	Chemical tanker	33.5 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	−15%	11.4	9,987 t	€366k
MAGNOLIA THERESA	9384162	Chemical tanker	33.3 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	−15%	11.0	8,909 t	€439k
SAKURA THERESA	1026776	Chemical tanker	17.4 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−19%	11.6	2,854 t	€91k
IRIS THERESA	9873254	Chemical tanker	17.2 g CO₂/t·nm	21.4	−19%	12.8	2,532 t	€76k
NQ FREESIA	9829772	Chemical tanker	30.1 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	−23%	9.9	7,408 t	€326k
NQ ROSA	9304318	Chemical tanker	30.1 g CO₂/t·nm	39.2	−23%	10.3	7,448 t	€329k

30 of 15 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.