Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MTM Ship Managementyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| MTM Ship Management | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 44 |
| CO₂ emitted | 205 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 68 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 6.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- MTM Ship Management13.5 (−19% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management | 30 | 13.5 | −19% | 66 | 10.9 | 2,366 | 7.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- MTM Ship Management8.5 (+5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management | 13 | 8.5 | +5% | 75 | 10.6 | 1,380 | 5.0% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- MTM Ship Management9.9 (+23% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management | 1 | 9.9 | +23% | 103 | 10.8 | 1,715 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTM Ship Management | Lloyd's Register (44) | 100% | 0% | 95% | 0% |
MTM Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRATEGIC TENACITY | 9626302 | Bulk carrier | 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | +16% | 9.7 | 3,260 t | €64k |
| MTM TORTOLA | 9742065 | Chemical tanker | 27.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +15% | 8.7 | 2,673 t | €47k |
| MTM SOUTHPORT | 9416032 | Chemical tanker | 23.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | 0% | 9.8 | 6,855 t | €127k |
| MTM MISSISSIPPI | 9315056 | Oil tanker | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | 0% | 10.8 | 5,980 t | €116k |
| STRATEGIC EXPLORER | 9723708 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | 0% | 9.9 | 3,294 t | €57k |
| STRATEGIC SYNERGY | 9648087 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | 0% | 11.1 | 1,734 t | €29k |
| MTM NEWPORT | 9774575 | Chemical tanker | 16.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −1% | 8.0 | 238 t | €4k |
| STRATEGIC FORTITUDE | 9753387 | Bulk carrier | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −5% | 7.7 | 1,752 t | €29k |
| STRATEGIC ENDEAVOR | 9475727 | Bulk carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −6% | 10.4 | 5,967 t | €101k |
| SCARLET RAY | 9799654 | Chemical tanker | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 12.0 | 8,488 t | €151k |
| MTM NORTH SOUND | 9360946 | Chemical tanker | 15.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 11.4 | 4,241 t | €73k |
| STRATEGIC VENTURE | 9648104 | Bulk carrier | 8.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −10% | 11.5 | 1,773 t | €28k |
| STRATEGIC EQUITY | 9689902 | Bulk carrier | 7.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −10% | 10.7 | 9,112 t | €146k |
| MTM AMAZON | 9374533 | Chemical tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −10% | 11.6 | 5,716 t | €96k |
| MTM NEW ORLEANS | 9749398 | Chemical tanker | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −11% | 10.3 | 1,587 t | €27k |
| STRATEGIC ENTITY | 9723710 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −13% | 11.7 | 2,417 t | €39k |
| STRATEGIC RESOLVE | 9719329 | Bulk carrier | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.1 | −15% | 10.4 | 1,765 t | €26k |
| MTM KEY WEST | 9790672 | Chemical tanker | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −16% | 10.4 | 3,318 t | €59k |
| STRATEGIC ALLIANCE | 9648075 | Bulk carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.7 | −17% | 12.0 | 3,357 t | €51k |
| MTM WESTPORT | 9317858 | Chemical tanker | 7.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −17% | 11.9 | 1,524 t | €23k |
| AMBER RAY | 9973664 | Chemical tanker | 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −18% | 12.4 | 9,654 t | €172k |
| LILAC RAY | 9883481 | Chemical tanker | 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −18% | 11.2 | 6,085 t | €106k |
| MTM AMSTERDAM | 9776444 | Chemical tanker | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −19% | 9.9 | 4,758 t | €96k |
| GOLDEN RAY | 9640102 | Chemical tanker | 18.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −20% | 10.8 | 9,658 t | €206k |
| MTM ROTTERDAM | 9477567 | Chemical tanker | 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −22% | 10.0 | 2,981 t | €68k |
| MTM SINGAPORE | 9477529 | Chemical tanker | 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −24% | 9.9 | 5,718 t | €101k |
| STRATEGIC SAVANNAH | 9686338 | Bulk carrier | 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −25% | 10.3 | 5,059 t | €93k |
| MTM DUBLIN | 9335824 | Chemical tanker | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −25% | 9.2 | 2,119 t | €33k |
| SILVER RAY | 9493133 | Chemical tanker | 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −27% | 9.6 | 9,077 t | €180k |
| STRATEGIC SPIRIT | 9626388 | Bulk carrier | 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −27% | 10.5 | 1,801 t | €29k |
30 of 44 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.