Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MTM TORTOLA

IMO
9742065
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
12,340 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd · part of MTM Ship Management

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,340 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
55.3 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−31%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.07
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−6%)
Average speed
10.7 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
931 t
CO₂ emitted
2,923 t
2,969 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
16,835 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,580 h
66 days, 18% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−31%)
52.8Ranks 183 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)
8.8Faster than 37% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−6%)
7.93Ranks 667 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU56%
  • Into the EU32%
  • At berth in the EU6%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,630 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MTM TORTOLA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • MTM TORTOLA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MTM TORTOLA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+2.0 kn−13%+7%+26%−48%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.3 kn−12%−23%+9%+57%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−2.5 kn+12%−10%−48%+24%2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+1.3 kn+25%+39%−32%+40%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021+1.8 kn−21%−6%−5%−26%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−1.9 kn+17%−3%−27%−8%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.8 kn+0%−14%+706%+64%1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd9312,92316,8351,58010.755.314.07–
2024MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd8492,67313,4131,5468.763.327.1393%
2023not published8822,77712,3221,23410.071.617.2991%
2022not published1,5074,76423,5791,88812.563.913.9195%
2021not published1,7835,64934,8393,09911.251.29.9785%
2020not published2,3947,58436,7193,9019.465.213.4079%
2019not published2,8038,79650,2184,45711.355.814.4966%
2018not published3481,0926,23047613.155.88.8698%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd14.0715.04−6%667 of 1,460Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2024MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd27.1316.73+62%938 of 1,274Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2023not published17.2916.23+7%699 of 1,314Lloyd's RegisterA
2022not published13.9116.06−13%545 of 1,409Lloyd's RegisterA+B+C
2021not published9.9716.69−40%175 of 1,343Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2020not published13.4016.16−17%436 of 1,312Lloyd's RegisterB+C
2019not published14.4917.32−16%478 of 1,321Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2018not published8.8617.14−48%96 of 1,294Lloyd's RegisterB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.