Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- NYKyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| NYK | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 71 |
| CO₂ emitted | 1.0 Mt−19.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 184 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 23 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- NYK9.3 (+30% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 22 | 9.3 | +30% | 252 | 14.1 | 2,556 | 1.9% | 17 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- NYK11.0 (−33% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 11 | 11.0 | −33% | 200 | 12.3 | 3,271 | 2.6% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- NYK42.1 (−24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 17 | 42.1 | −24% | 91 | 14.1 | 1,806 | 3.0% | 3 |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- NYK6.5 (−18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 8 | 6.5 | −18% | 123 | 10.5 | 911 | 3.0% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- NYK34.7 (−63% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 2 | 34.7 | −63% | 87 | 14.5 | 2,178 | 2.9% | 1 |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- NYK7.7 (−49% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 3 | 7.7 | −49% | 88 | 10.9 | 1,659 | 6.9% | 2 |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- NYK18.6 (−48% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 5 | 18.6 | −48% | 116 | 14.2 | 396 | 7.1% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- NYK11.9 (−53% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 2 | 11.9 | −53% | 94 | 9.3 | 1,762 | 8.0% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Passenger
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 1,819
- NYK2,071 (+14% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK | 1 | 2,071 | +14% | 220 | 15.7 | 876 | 3.7% | – |
| Segment median | 1,819 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
NYK: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DORADO LEADER | 9308895 | Vehicle carrier | 870 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +449% | 11.0 | 2,726 t | €62k |
| LANTANA PLANET | 9933444 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 149 g CO₂/t·nm | 62.3 | +139% | 16.6 | 1,915 t | €52k |
| LUSAIL | 9285952 | LNG carrier | 16.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +130% | 14.0 | 23,635 t | €630k |
| GRACE DAHLIALNG | 9540716 | LNG carrier | 15.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +123% | 9.1 | 12,848 t | €473k |
| AL UTOURIYA | 9360867 | LNG carrier | 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +115% | 13.9 | 40,532 t | €1.1m |
| AL KHORLNG | 9085613 | LNG carrier | 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +115% | 13.7 | 19,459 t | €515k |
| LUPINUS PLANET | 9929209 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 243 g CO₂/t·nm | 117 | +108% | 12.1 | 2,321 t | €62k |
| FRONTIER HARVEST | 9487976 | Bulk carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | +88% | 10.0 | 8,474 t | €236k |
| HELIOS LEADER | 9476745 | Vehicle carrier | 297 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | +88% | 15.6 | 1,172 t | €35k |
| LNG BORNOLNG | 9322803 | LNG carrier | 12.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +73% | 13.0 | 8,356 t | €224k |
| LNG OGUNLNG | 9322815 | LNG carrier | 11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +61% | 13.0 | 18,988 t | €502k |
| MALANJELNG | 9490959 | LNG carrier | 10.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 13.0 | 37,129 t | €995k |
| CUBALLNG | 9491812 | LNG carrier | 9.8 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +38% | 15.2 | 44,600 t | €1.2m |
| AL THUMAMA | 9360843 | LNG carrier | 9.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +34% | 15.2 | 69,696 t | €1.9m |
| LNG SAKURALNG | 9774135 | LNG carrier | 9.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +33% | 13.1 | 22,886 t | €613k |
| ATLAS LEADER | 9531739 | Vehicle carrier | 101 g CO₂/t·nm | 76.1 | +32% | 10.6 | 830 t | €26k |
| AL SAHLA | 9360855 | LNG carrier | 9.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +30% | 15.1 | 85,137 t | €2.3m |
| SHINSHU MARULNG | 9791200 | LNG carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +30% | 13.6 | 20,290 t | €540k |
| GRACE FREESIALNG | 9903920 | LNG carrier | 9.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +29% | 12.7 | 11,162 t | €300k |
| DIAMOND GAS METROPOLISLNG | 9862487 | LNG carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +28% | 15.1 | 9,834 t | €264k |
| DIAMOND GAS CRYSTALLNG | 9874454 | LNG carrier | 8.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +21% | 12.8 | 12,079 t | €369k |
| NYK ROMULUS | 9416989 | Container | 17.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +19% | 13.4 | 11,936 t | €373k |
| NYK REMUS | 9416965 | Container | 16.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +14% | 13.1 | 13,953 t | €434k |
| ENERGY GLORYLNG | 9752565 | LNG carrier | 8.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 10.9 | 7,921 t | €213k |
| ASUKA II | 8806204 | Passenger | 2,071 g CO₂/pax·nm | 1,819 | +14% | 15.7 | 9,405 t | €312k |
| ORION LEADER | 9182289 | Vehicle carrier | 39.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +14% | 13.9 | 2,563 t | €67k |
| NYK DIANA | 9337688 | Container | 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +9% | 12.3 | 24,313 t | €851k |
| MARVEL CRANELNG | 9770438 | LNG carrier | 7.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +5% | 15.1 | 7,671 t | €206k |
| VIRGO LEADER | 9273894 | Vehicle carrier | 45.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 43.7 | +3% | 15.2 | 6,927 t | €212k |
| NYK VENUS | 9312793 | Container | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | 0% | 14.0 | 34,132 t | €872k |
30 of 71 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.