Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- CMA CGMyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| CMA CGM | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 198 |
| CO₂ emitted | 4.8 Mt−12.8% |
| Fuel per mile | 211 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 29 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- CMA CGM14.0 (−14% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA CGM | 196 | 14.0 | −14% | 213 | 12.3 | 2,962 | 4.3% | 29 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9
- CMA CGM23.7 (+139% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA CGM | 2 | 23.7 | +139% | 66 | 11.0 | 3,703 | 14.2% | – |
| Segment median | 9.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA CGM | ABS (196), EnvService (2) | 2% | 0% | 97% | 0% |
CMA CGM: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MONT VENTOUX | 9129586 | Con-ro | 31.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +213% | 9.5 | 8,757 t | €284k |
| CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS | 9239874 | Container | 36.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +65% | 6.5 | 2,982 t | €84k |
| AKNOUL | 8917883 | Con-ro | 16.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +65% | 11.9 | 8,246 t | €237k |
| CMA CGM RED | 9690107 | Container | 36.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +63% | 13.3 | 8,600 t | €248k |
| CMA CGM NEVA | 9745548 | Container | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +62% | 15.0 | 12,941 t | €273k |
| CMA CGM PREGOLIA | 9745500 | Container | 35.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +58% | 15.2 | 9,905 t | €287k |
| CMA CGM ABU DHABI | 9802499 | Container | 34.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +53% | 15.1 | 10,673 t | €302k |
| CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE | 9261891 | Container | 33.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +49% | 5.9 | 8,691 t | €248k |
| CMA CGM SINNAMARY | 9845673 | Container | 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +48% | 13.8 | 28,884 t | €864k |
| CMA CGM KOUROU | 9845659 | Container | 32.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +46% | 13.9 | 24,369 t | €724k |
| CMA CGM BENJAMIN FRANKLIN | 9706891 | Container | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +42% | 15.7 | 71,315 t | €2.1m |
| CMA CGM NAVEGANTES | 9303780 | Container | 31.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +41% | 8.5 | 7,381 t | €206k |
| CMA CGM CAYENNE | 9709192 | Container | 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +39% | 12.8 | 20,591 t | €651k |
| CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE | 9702156 | Container | 9.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +39% | 14.7 | 48,759 t | €1.5m |
| CMA CGM ZHENG HE | 9706906 | Container | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +39% | 14.8 | 29,557 t | €881k |
| CMA CGM MARSEILLE | 9709207 | Container | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +37% | 12.4 | 26,347 t | €793k |
| CMA CGM TAGE | 9674555 | Container | 14.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +37% | 12.0 | 12,432 t | €214k |
| CMA CGM MAPUTO | 9491628 | Container | 30.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +36% | 10.8 | 11,261 t | €458k |
| CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT | 9709219 | Container | 30.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +36% | 14.0 | 29,023 t | €852k |
| CMA CGM APOLLON | 9882516 | Container | 13.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +33% | 14.8 | 2,486 t | €78k |
| CMA CGM KERGUELEN | 9702132 | Container | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +32% | 15.8 | 42,090 t | €1.3m |
| CMA CGM DAVAO | 9347293 | Container | 29.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +32% | 7.2 | 1,927 t | €56k |
| CMA CGM BLUE | 9756107 | Container | 29.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +31% | 14.8 | 9,788 t | €251k |
| CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA | 9706889 | Container | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +31% | 15.5 | 57,368 t | €1.7m |
| CMA CGM BALBOA | 9344655 | Container | 58.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +30% | 12.8 | 1,198 t | €32k |
| CMA CGM FIDELIO | 9299642 | Container | 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +29% | 13.7 | 31,721 t | €993k |
| CMA CGM ORANGE | 9690092 | Container | 27.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +25% | 14.8 | 7,823 t | €226k |
| APL SINGAPURA | 9632002 | Container | 8.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +24% | 15.2 | 65,407 t | €2.0m |
| CMA CGM GOYA | 9365972 | Container | 55.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +23% | 11.4 | 15,662 t | €455k |
| CMA CGM RODOLPHE | 9729075 | Container | 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +23% | 16.6 | 27,975 t | €741k |
30 of 210 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.