Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM RED

IMO: 9690107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,119 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 15.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEATRADE RED

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,119 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

116.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+121%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,736 t

CO₂ emitted

8,600 t

8,735 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,550 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,771 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 116.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−34%)

78.8Ranks 669 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+121%)

7.22Ranks 1,804 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU36%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU3%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,723 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM RED
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM RED
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM RED
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+12%	−2%	−25%	+12%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−4%	−1%	+19%	−9%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+7%	+5%	−26%	+30%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−7%	−5%	+9%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+11%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−11%	−15%	+11%	+13%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	+4%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	2,736	8,600	23,550	1,771	13.3	116.2	36.09	97%
2024part-year	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	2,662	8,382	26,651	1,734	15.4	99.9	34.18	–
2024	CMA CGM SA	3,232	10,171	31,281	2,050	15.3	103.3	32.21	16%
2023	not published	2,807	8,827	26,180	1,763	14.8	107.2	35.59	–
2022	not published	3,564	11,160	35,563	2,345	15.2	100.2	27.39	–
2021	not published	3,525	11,072	32,669	2,207	14.8	107.9	27.78	–
2020	not published	3,104	9,766	29,413	1,908	15.4	105.5	28.73	–
2019	not published	3,125	9,780	26,402	1,632	16.2	118.4	25.48	–
2018	not published	2,799	8,749	25,383	1,618	15.7	110.3	25.26	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	36.09	16.30	+121%	1,804 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	CMA CGM SA	32.21	17.52	+84%	1,496 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	35.59	19.40	+83%	1,462 of 1,899	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	27.39	19.13	+43%	1,226 of 1,825	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	27.78	17.90	+55%	1,247 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	28.73	17.58	+63%	1,315 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	25.48	18.88	+35%	1,135 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	25.26	20.22	+25%	1,049 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.