Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH TOKYO

IMO: 9285483
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,938 t
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,938 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

134.3 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 103.3 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.31 (−4%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,162 t

CO₂ emitted

13,014 t

13,218 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,004 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,118 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 335 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 134.3 kg/nm · median 103.3 (+30%)

80.4Ranks 331 of 335, lowest first119.6

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

12.3Faster than 59% of vehicle carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.31 (−4%)

37.69Ranks 153 of 335, lowest first158.40

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU22%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU2%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,191 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HOEGH TOKYO
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

HOEGH TOKYO
Vehicle carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH TOKYO
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+4%	+15%	−19%	+47%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+12%	+3%	−2%	−11%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−0.2 kn	+17%	+15%	+543%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−26%	−8%	−60%	−14%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−4%	−11%	−14%	−41%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	4,162	13,014	31,004	2,118	14.6	134.3	52.88	–
2023	not published	4,985	15,155	38,496	2,917	13.2	129.5	35.96	–
2022	not published	4,559	14,270	39,296	2,750	14.3	116.0	40.51	–
2020	not published	604	1,905	6,114	421	14.5	98.9	46.67	–
2019	not published	2,062	6,496	15,450	1,318	11.7	133.5	54.52	–
2018	not published	2,475	7,762	17,883	1,412	12.7	138.4	92.06	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	52.88	55.31	−4%	153 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	35.96	56.64	−37%	27 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	40.51	57.66	−30%	48 of 463	DNV	C
2020	not published	46.67	57.26	−18%	111 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	54.52	58.95	−8%	171 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	92.06	62.35	+48%	335 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.