Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

VISION

IMO: 9295347
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,739 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: ADVANTAGE PARK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ALVIN DENIZCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,739 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.0

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+189%)

Average speed

6.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

511 t

CO₂ emitted

1,628 t

1,653 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,158 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

767 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.0 kg/nm · median 129 (−23%)

76.1Ranks 410 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 10.7 (−37%)

8.0Faster than 4% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+189%)

4.51Ranks 1,444 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU53%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU9%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (889 t).

Fuel burned laden

194 t

38% of all fuel; 62% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

150 t

9.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+25 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VISION
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VISION
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VISION
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.0 kn	+16%	−27%	−11%	+143%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−22%	−20%	−52%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+6%	+14%	−62%	−18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+1%	+10%	−3%	−23%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−9%	−7%	−28%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−19%	+35%	+67%	−24%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ALVIN DENIZCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI	511	1,628	5,158	767	6.7	99.0	23.0	38%
2024part-year	Royal Marine Shipmanagement	280	892	3,514	360	9.8	79.6	7.88	100%
2024	SHAHIN MARITIME CO.	491	1,552	5,771	541	10.7	85.0	9.46	57%
2023	not published	1,301	4,132	12,002	1,144	10.5	108	12.6	73%
2022	not published	3,206	10,231	31,349	3,215	9.7	102	15.4	55%
2021	not published	3,277	10,356	32,410	3,601	9.0	101	19.9	52%
2020	not published	4,954	15,734	44,792	5,060	8.9	111	18.2	–
2019	not published	3,642	11,378	26,742	5,028	5.3	136	23.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ALVIN DENIZCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI	23.0	7.95	+189%	1,444 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024part-year	Royal Marine Shipmanagement	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	SHAHIN MARITIME CO.	9.46	8.06	+17%	1,101 of 1,787	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	12.6	8.44	+49%	1,326 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	15.4	8.51	+81%	1,561 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	19.9	8.86	+124%	1,521 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	18.2	9.03	+101%	1,539 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	23.9	8.83	+171%	1,708 of 1,919	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.