Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EVRIDIKI

IMO: 9318137
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 78,957 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.75 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 78,957 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

159

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−21%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,053 t

CO₂ emitted

18,916 t

19,213 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,148 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,899 h

162 days, 45% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 159 kg/nm · median 129 (+24%)

76.1Ranks 1,284 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.7 (−8%)

8.0Faster than 26% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−21%)

4.51Ranks 496 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU40%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,941 t).

Fuel burned laden

5,163 t

85% of all fuel; 15% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

961 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+297 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVRIDIKI
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVRIDIKI
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVRIDIKI
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	−2%	−18%	−46%	−24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+7%	+0%	+181%	+90%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−10%	−8%	−5%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+5.1 kn	−11%	+52%	+363%	−14%	5.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.3 kn	+15%	−28%	−45%	−23%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−46%	+40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.6 kn	+2%	+34%	+102%	−33%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	6,053	18,916	38,148	3,899	9.8	159	6.28	85%
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	11,552	36,159	71,072	6,122	11.6	163	8.26	55%
2023	not published	3,837	12,113	25,277	2,033	12.4	152	4.35	79%
2022	not published	4,457	14,061	26,474	2,172	12.2	168	4.36	77%
2021	not published	1,085	3,428	5,717	800	7.1	190	5.08	67%
2020	not published	1,712	5,432	10,356	906	11.4	165	6.57	–
2019	not published	3,250	10,193	19,203	1,680	11.4	169	4.68	–
2018	not published	1,573	4,910	9,523	1,088	8.8	165	7.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	6.28	7.95	−21%	496 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	8.26	8.06	+2%	933 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	4.35	8.44	−48%	117 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	4.36	8.51	−49%	124 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	5.08	8.86	−43%	234 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	6.57	9.03	−27%	473 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	4.68	8.83	−47%	203 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	7.01	8.86	−21%	585 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.