Navalyze · Container · Ship

GSL CHATEAU D'IF

IMO: 9335202
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,614 t
Port of registry: Valleta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CMA CGM CHATEAU D' IF

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,614 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

167.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.62

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−10%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,747 t

CO₂ emitted

27,241 t

27,671 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

52,318 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,792 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 167.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−6%)

78.8Ranks 1,047 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 13.3 (−18%)

9.1Faster than 21% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.62 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−10%)

7.22Ranks 983 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU38%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU5%

75% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,361 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−1%	−17%	−10%	+8%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	+24%	−15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−21%	−28%	+18%	+2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+2%	−7%	−27%	−12%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+17%	+42%	−16%	+24%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−17%	−26%	−11%	−11%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	+2%	−9%	−15%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	8,747	27,241	52,318	4,792	10.9	167.2	14.62	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,862	30,762	58,351	4,463	13.1	169.0	13.48	–
2023	not published	7,590	23,709	46,923	3,689	12.7	161.8	15.85	–
2022	not published	8,162	25,545	39,801	2,861	13.9	205.1	15.59	–
2021	not published	10,925	34,106	54,465	3,568	15.3	200.6	17.70	–
2020	not published	11,198	34,990	65,216	5,188	12.6	171.7	14.22	–
2019	not published	15,126	47,251	73,385	5,173	14.2	206.1	15.97	–
2018	not published	17,527	54,750	86,348	5,472	15.8	203.0	15.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	14.62	16.30	−10%	983 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.48	17.52	−23%	717 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.85	19.40	−18%	777 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	15.59	19.13	−19%	743 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	17.70	17.90	−1%	885 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	14.22	17.58	−19%	686 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	15.97	18.88	−15%	722 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	15.59	20.22	−23%	585 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.