Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MASTRAFJORD

IMO: 9344760
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: FlorØ
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FJORD1 AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

53.9

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−64%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

106

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−81%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,314 t

CO₂ emitted

8,894 t

11,373 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,471 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,128 h

172 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 53.9 kg/nm · median 150 (−64%)

69.3Ranks 28 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 37% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 106 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−81%)

66.8Ranks 80 of 408, lowest first1,569

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU33%

99% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,769 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,229 t

25.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

85.1 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq uplift

+2,479 t

+27.9% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MASTRAFJORD
Ro-pax median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MASTRAFJORD
Ro-pax median

14.815.015.315.515.816.0

’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MASTRAFJORD
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	+10%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	FJORD1 AS	3,314	8,894	61,471	4,128	14.9	53.9	–	–
2024LNG	FJORD1 AS	2,889	7,757	55,716	3,696	15.1	51.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	FJORD1 AS	106	567	−81%	80 of 408	DNV	A
2024LNG	FJORD1 AS	108	547	−80%	83 of 404	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.