Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

CS BEST

IMO
9350989
Type
Other ship types
Average cargo carried
3,754 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 24.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
STAR BEST

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,754 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
104
Other median 87.2 kg/nm (+19%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
86.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.7 (−0%)
Average speed
17.4 kn
Other median 10.4 kn (+67%)
Fuel per day at sea
43.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,256 t
CO₂ emitted
3,924 t
3,985 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
12,097 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
697 h
29 days, 8% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 104 kg/nm · median 87.2 (+19%)
47.6Ranks 97 of 159, lowest first161
Average speedThis ship 17.4 kn · median 10.4 (+67%)
5.8Faster than 97% of other ships13.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 86.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.7 (−0%)
30.8Ranks 79 of 159, lowest first600
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports3%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU54%
  • At berth in the EU3%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,069 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
100 t
2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+61 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CS BEST
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • CS BEST
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CS BEST
  • Other median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.5 kn−26%−14%−22%–2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.5 kn+31%+19%−73%–1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023+1.4 kn−17%−9%+153%+64%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.0 kn+4%−9%−25%+15%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.6 kn+11%+7%−53%−55%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.1,2563,92412,09769717.410486.4–
2024BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.2,1696,81415,5221,04114.9140––
2023not published6,09719,01856,9723,48216.410777.2–
2021not published2,8919,02122,5581,50715.012847.1–
2020not published3,70211,55229,9621,75817.012440.9–
2019not published7,14722,31664,1533,64417.611191.3–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.86.486.7−0%79 of 159ClassNKB+C
2024BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.––––ClassNKB+C
2023not published77.293.5−17%52 of 116ClassNKB+C
2021not published47.155.0−14%49 of 158ClassNKB+C
2020not published40.959.1−31%21 of 149ClassNKB+C
2019not published91.362.6+46%115 of 147ClassNKB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.