Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MARIETJE ANDREA

IMO
9361134
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Netherlands
Port of registry
Delfzijl
Technical efficiency
EEXI 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DANSER VAN GENT MA CV

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
38.6
General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+10%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
18.3
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−28%)
Average speed
9.8 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
9.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,131 t
CO₂ emitted
6,783 t
6,887 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
55,193 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,653 h
236 days, 65% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 38.6 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+10%)
17.4Ranks 1,498 of 2,723, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 9.3 (+5%)
6.9Faster than 60% of general cargo ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−28%)
10.2Ranks 667 of 2,723, lowest first52.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports60%
  • From the EU8%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU3%

81% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,517 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
215 t
3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+104 t
+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MARIETJE ANDREA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • MARIETJE ANDREA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • MARIETJE ANDREA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.6 kn−1%+5%+17%–0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+0.5 kn−8%−3%−4%–0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.1 kn+0%−11%+14%+19%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.2 kn+10%+8%−11%+10%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.0 kn−6%+18%+13%−15%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.1 kn−16%−1%−4%−17%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.6 kn+21%−13%−10%+25%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025DANSER VAN GENT MA CV2,1316,78355,1935,6539.838.6––
2024DANSER VAN GENT MA CV1,8415,83947,1485,1419.239.019.6–
2023not published2,0876,61949,3355,6528.742.3––
2022not published1,8245,74743,1574,3839.842.2––
2021not published1,8635,92548,5624,83210.038.4––
2020not published1,7555,54342,8835,3348.040.9––
2019not published2,1696,82744,4716,4786.948.8––
2018not published1,9876,28249,4735,2089.540.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025DANSER VAN GENT MA CV18.325.5−28%667 of 2,723Bureau VeritasA
2024DANSER VAN GENT MA CV––––Bureau VeritasA+B
2023not published24.320.7+17%669 of 1,045Bureau VeritasA+B
2022not published20.421.6−5%468 of 1,034Bureau VeritasA+B
2021not published18.522.7−18%368 of 1,142Bureau VeritasA+B
2020not published21.824.5−11%448 of 1,167Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published26.325.0+5%629 of 1,154Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published21.124.9−15%379 of 1,044Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.