Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BBC SCANDINAVIA

IMO: 9362633
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John´S

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

61.0

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+73%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

50.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+99%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+32%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

569 t

CO₂ emitted

1,786 t

1,814 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,334 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

761 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+73%)

17.4Ranks 2,086 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 9.3 (+32%)

6.9Faster than 92% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 50.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+99%)

10.2Ranks 2,437 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU10%
Into the EU89%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (909 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

32 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+28 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BBC SCANDINAVIA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BBC SCANDINAVIA
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BBC SCANDINAVIA
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−0%	−3%	−57%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+8%	+1%	−26%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−2%	+4%	+67%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−9%	−14%	−42%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−4%	+5%	+225%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+11%	+54%	−65%	−4%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.6 kn	−1%	−23%	−12%	−1%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	569	1,786	9,334	761	12.3	61.0	–	–
2024	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	1,319	4,148	21,574	1,697	12.7	61.1	–	–
2023	not published	1,664	5,196	29,333	2,171	13.5	56.7	–	–
2022	not published	1,017	3,179	17,594	1,382	12.7	57.8	–	–
2021	not published	1,918	6,063	30,288	2,248	13.5	63.3	–	–
2020	not published	615	1,940	9,316	759	12.3	66.0	–	–
2019	not published	1,588	4,981	26,764	3,000	8.9	59.3	–	–
2018	not published	1,806	5,649	30,266	2,623	11.5	59.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	50.9	25.5	+99%	2,437 of 2,723	DNV	B
2024	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	42.5	24.5	+73%	998 of 1,167	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	44.4	25.0	+78%	969 of 1,154	Korean Register	B
2018	not published	45.1	24.9	+81%	874 of 1,044	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.