Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CDRY WHITE

IMO: 9365506
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,113 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Naples
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,113 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

43.0

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

33.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+31%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,465 t

CO₂ emitted

4,696 t

4,768 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,083 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,307 h

138 days, 38% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 43.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+22%)

17.4Ranks 1,686 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 9.3 (+11%)

6.9Faster than 70% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 33.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+31%)

10.2Ranks 1,985 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports69%
From the EU8%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU13%

91% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,265 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

598 t

12.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+72 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CDRY WHITE
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CDRY WHITE
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

CDRY WHITE
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−1%	−8%	+14%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−6%	−3%	−15%	−1%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−7%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+0%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+4%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+3.8 kn	−16%	+30%	+13%	−14%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	+19%	−24%	−7%	–	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,465	4,696	34,083	3,307	10.3	43.0	33.5	–
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,300	4,168	29,839	2,702	11.0	43.6	32.6	–
2023	not published	1,626	5,212	35,152	3,274	10.7	46.2	33.0	–
2022	not published	1,682	5,392	37,804	3,506	10.8	44.5	32.3	–
2021	not published	1,641	5,260	37,685	3,497	10.8	43.5	30.9	–
2020	not published	1,599	5,126	36,246	3,355	10.8	44.1	36.2	100%
2019	not published	1,668	5,227	31,964	4,535	7.0	52.2	42.0	–
2018	not published	1,502	4,699	34,257	3,114	11.0	43.9	0.64	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	33.5	25.5	+31%	1,985 of 2,723	RINA	B
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	32.6	19.3	+69%	940 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	33.0	20.7	+59%	878 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	32.3	21.6	+50%	809 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	30.9	22.7	+36%	884 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	36.2	24.5	+48%	932 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	42.0	25.0	+68%	947 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.