Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SONGA TAURUS

IMO: 9373644
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,253 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PATANI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Songa Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,253 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

86.0 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

37.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+151%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,594 t

CO₂ emitted

8,272 t

8,399 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,166 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,966 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 86.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+8%)

52.8Ranks 886 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 11.1 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 27% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+151%)

7.93Ranks 1,278 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports53%
From the EU15%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU12%

79% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,546 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SONGA TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SONGA TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SONGA TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−5%	−1%	+8%	−5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−8%	−7%	+282%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−2%	−10%	−77%	+15%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+3%	+2%	−11%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+0%	+4%	+11%	+11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	−8%	+73%	+3%	−3%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+32%	+13%	−20%	+7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	2,594	8,272	30,166	2,966	10.2	86.0	37.81	–
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	2,523	8,090	27,912	2,852	9.8	90.4	40.00	–
2023	not published	719	2,306	7,304	757	9.6	98.5	48.20	–
2022	not published	3,254	10,375	32,429	3,097	10.5	100.3	42.08	–
2021	not published	3,540	11,242	36,235	3,441	10.5	97.7	40.38	–
2020	not published	3,171	10,094	32,594	3,207	10.2	97.3	36.37	–
2019	not published	3,339	10,554	31,585	5,866	5.4	105.7	37.54	–
2018	not published	3,142	9,902	39,336	6,226	6.3	79.9	35.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	37.81	15.04	+151%	1,278 of 1,460	Korean Register	B
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	40.00	16.73	+139%	1,119 of 1,274	Korean Register	B
2023	not published	48.20	8.44	+471%	1,736 of 1,797	Korean Register	B
2022	not published	42.08	16.06	+162%	1,284 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	40.38	16.69	+142%	1,202 of 1,343	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	36.37	16.16	+125%	1,134 of 1,312	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	37.54	17.32	+117%	1,137 of 1,321	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	35.24	17.14	+106%	1,077 of 1,294	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.