Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

DIVINA

IMO: 9377200
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,623 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Livorno
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DALMARE SPA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,623 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

67.1

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+481%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,893 t

CO₂ emitted

9,213 t

9,355 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,131 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,213 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.1 kg/nm · median 129 (−48%)

76.1Ranks 113 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.0Faster than 36% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+481%)

4.51Ranks 1,600 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU22%

95% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,744 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,011 t

21.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+142 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DIVINA
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DIVINA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DIVINA
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−5%	−10%	+6%	−9%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−13%	−12%	+5%	−5%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−10%	−11%	+4%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+6%	−5%	−15%	+10%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−0%	−2%	−3%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+5.3 kn	−2%	+74%	+33%	+1%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−2%	−6%	−24%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DALMARE SPA	2,893	9,213	43,131	4,213	10.2	67.1	46.2	–
2024	DALMARE SPA	2,897	9,143	40,830	3,795	10.8	71.0	50.7	–
2023	not published	3,193	10,028	38,928	3,695	10.5	82.0	53.5	–
2022	not published	3,385	10,619	37,298	3,488	10.7	90.7	55.9	–
2021	not published	3,738	11,715	43,667	3,673	11.9	85.6	50.7	–
2020	not published	3,866	12,114	44,934	3,724	12.1	86.0	50.9	–
2019	not published	2,956	9,271	33,683	4,973	6.8	87.8	50.5	–
2018	not published	3,959	12,407	44,272	6,259	7.1	89.4	53.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DALMARE SPA	46.2	7.95	+481%	1,600 of 1,665	RINA	A
2024	DALMARE SPA	50.7	8.06	+529%	1,739 of 1,787	RINA	A
2023	not published	53.5	8.44	+534%	1,748 of 1,797	RINA	B
2022	not published	55.9	8.51	+557%	1,916 of 1,961	RINA	B
2021	not published	50.7	8.86	+472%	1,734 of 1,789	RINA	B
2020	not published	50.9	9.03	+464%	1,816 of 1,870	RINA	B
2019	not published	50.5	8.83	+472%	1,860 of 1,919	RINA	B
2018	not published	53.7	8.86	+507%	1,735 of 1,779	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.