Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BARBARICA

IMO: 9383443
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,961 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,961 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.8

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+264%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,979 t

CO₂ emitted

9,438 t

9,584 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,416 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,331 h

139 days, 38% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.8 kg/nm · median 129 (−36%)

76.1Ranks 230 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.0Faster than 56% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+264%)

4.51Ranks 1,512 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU29%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU8%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,824 t).

Fuel burned laden

2,038 t

68% of all fuel; 32% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

740 t

7.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+146 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BARBARICA
Oil tanker median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BARBARICA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BARBARICA
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−3%	+2%	−10%	−11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+6%	+3%	+25%	+53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−14%	−15%	+102%	−60%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	−6%	+7%	−40%	+159%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.5 kn	−47%	−29%	+482%	–	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+2.5 kn	+65%	+156%	−77%	–	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 65%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	2,979	9,438	36,416	3,331	10.9	81.8	28.9	68%
2024	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	3,407	10,738	40,519	3,884	10.4	84.1	32.5	66%
2023	not published	2,567	8,064	32,387	3,022	10.7	79.2	21.2	–
2022	not published	1,478	4,648	16,040	1,477	10.9	92.1	53.7	–
2021	not published	2,620	8,270	26,715	2,793	9.6	98.1	20.7	–
2020	not published	844	2,690	4,593	644	7.1	184	160	–
2018	not published	2,223	6,972	19,948	4,331	4.6	112	24.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	28.9	7.95	+264%	1,512 of 1,665	ABS	A+B
2024	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	32.5	8.06	+303%	1,674 of 1,787	ABS	–
2023	not published	21.2	8.44	+151%	1,560 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	53.7	8.51	+531%	1,910 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	20.7	8.86	+134%	1,539 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	–
2018	not published	24.9	8.86	+181%	1,615 of 1,779	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.