Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FRISIANA

IMO: 9385893
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Sneek
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.27 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Boomsma Shipping BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

42.3

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.8

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+21%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,586 t

CO₂ emitted

4,982 t

5,060 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,465 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,504 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 42.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+20%)

17.4Ranks 1,664 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 9.3 (+15%)

6.9Faster than 75% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+21%)

10.2Ranks 1,819 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU12%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU5%

86% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,273 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

249 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+78 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRISIANA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRISIANA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FRISIANA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−3%	+0%	−17%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.9 kn	−6%	+15%	+3%	−28%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+3%	−8%	+37%	+85%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.4 kn	+24%	−1%	−29%	+11%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	−14%	−2%	−8%	−41%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+7%	+3%	−5%	+128%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.2 kn	−2%	+39%	+52%	−29%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	1,586	4,982	37,465	3,504	10.7	42.3	–	–
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	1,954	6,139	44,943	4,319	10.4	43.5	39.4	–
2023	not published	2,020	6,402	43,814	5,126	8.5	46.1	–	–
2022	not published	1,430	4,502	32,088	3,343	9.6	44.6	30.4	–
2021	not published	1,642	5,126	45,479	3,777	12.0	36.1	–	–
2020	not published	2,077	6,503	49,249	4,709	10.5	42.2	–	–
2019	not published	2,053	6,451	52,071	4,798	10.9	39.4	25.4	–
2018	not published	1,367	4,307	34,208	4,433	7.7	40.0	24.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	30.8	25.5	+21%	1,819 of 2,723	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	32.8	19.3	+70%	945 of 1,111	Lloyd's Register	–
2023	not published	45.4	20.7	+120%	963 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	24.5	21.6	+14%	618 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	22.1	22.7	−3%	534 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	37.7	24.5	+54%	948 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	16.5	25.0	−34%	224 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	23.2	24.9	−7%	457 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.