Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FRISIAN OCEAN

IMO: 9385922
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Sneek
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Boomsma Shipping BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

44.8

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

35.3

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+38%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,782 t

CO₂ emitted

5,585 t

5,672 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

39,742 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,156 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 44.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+27%)

17.4Ranks 1,759 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 9.3 (+3%)

6.9Faster than 55% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 35.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+38%)

10.2Ranks 2,045 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU29%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,041 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

98 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+87 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRISIAN OCEAN
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRISIAN OCEAN
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FRISIAN OCEAN
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+1%	−3%	−10%	+56%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+9%	+23%	+1%	−30%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	+0%	−16%	−14%	+45%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	−6%	+26%	+26%	−38%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	+3%	−20%	−11%	+56%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+5%	+2%	−4%	−8%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−0%	+18%	+2%	+9%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	1,782	5,585	39,742	4,156	9.6	44.8	–	–
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	1,944	6,117	43,988	4,389	10.0	44.2	29.0	–
2023	not published	1,772	5,552	43,660	4,938	8.8	40.6	–	–
2022	not published	2,058	6,441	50,665	4,859	10.4	40.6	30.1	–
2021	not published	1,749	5,480	40,329	5,178	7.8	43.4	–	–
2020	not published	1,911	6,027	45,147	4,537	10.0	42.3	–	–
2019	not published	1,898	5,985	47,226	4,600	10.3	40.2	28.0	–
2018	not published	1,872	5,902	46,405	5,334	8.7	40.3	26.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	35.3	25.5	+38%	2,045 of 2,723	Lloyd's Register	–
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	22.5	19.3	+17%	692 of 1,111	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	32.2	20.7	+56%	866 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	22.3	21.6	+3%	542 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	35.6	22.7	+57%	964 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	22.8	24.5	−7%	508 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	24.9	25.0	−0%	574 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	22.9	24.9	−8%	448 of 1,044	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.