Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HISTRIA TIGER

IMO: 9396335
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 19,909 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.48 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Histria Shipmanagement Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,909 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

92.3

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+86%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,444 t

CO₂ emitted

7,798 t

7,918 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,481 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,988 h

125 days, 34% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 92.3 kg/nm · median 129 (−28%)

76.1Ranks 340 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 10.7 (−17%)

8.0Faster than 16% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+86%)

4.51Ranks 1,294 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU33%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU12%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,441 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

957 t

12.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+120 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HISTRIA TIGER
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HISTRIA TIGER
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HISTRIA TIGER
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−1%	−3%	−10%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	−10%	−23%	−20%	−11%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+6%	+13%	−10%	+26%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	+102%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−3%	+15%	−45%	+6%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	+3%	+37%	+43%	−10%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	−20%	−51%	+8%	+27%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Histria Shipmanagement Srl	2,444	7,798	26,481	2,988	8.9	92.3	14.8	–
2024	Histria Shipmanagement Srl	2,755	8,711	29,554	3,279	9.0	93.2	16.7	–
2023	not published	3,815	12,076	36,797	3,471	10.6	104	18.7	–
2022	not published	3,974	12,479	40,699	4,087	10.0	97.6	14.9	–
2021	not published	2,022	6,342	20,116	1,972	10.2	101	19.4	–
2020	not published	3,792	11,875	36,566	4,266	8.6	104	18.2	–
2019	not published	2,577	8,065	25,596	3,982	6.4	101	20.3	–
2018	not published	2,988	9,352	23,784	2,281	10.4	126	16.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Histria Shipmanagement Srl	14.8	7.95	+86%	1,294 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	Histria Shipmanagement Srl	16.7	8.06	+107%	1,465 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	18.7	8.44	+122%	1,509 of 1,797	DNV	A
2022	not published	14.9	8.51	+75%	1,541 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	19.4	8.86	+119%	1,508 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	18.2	9.03	+102%	1,543 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.3	8.83	+130%	1,641 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	16.0	8.86	+81%	1,430 of 1,779	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.