Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

STAVFJORD

IMO: 9401544
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,030 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: O.H. Meling Tankers KS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,030 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.3

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

31.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+293%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,101 t

CO₂ emitted

6,737 t

6,840 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,821 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,736 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.3 kg/nm · median 129 (−39%)

76.1Ranks 196 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.7 (−8%)

8.0Faster than 27% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+293%)

4.51Ranks 1,532 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU17%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU15%

83% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,564 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,023 t

15.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+103 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STAVFJORD
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STAVFJORD
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STAVFJORD
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+7%	+3%	−10%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−12%	−9%	+29%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+8%	+5%	−31%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+12%	+15%	−11%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+5%	+5%	−18%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+5.2 kn	−8%	+100%	+27%	−58%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−11%	−41%	−13%	+84%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	O.H. Meling Tankers KS	2,101	6,737	26,821	2,736	9.8	78.3	31.3	–
2024	O.H. Meling Tankers KS	2,180	6,990	29,753	2,948	10.1	73.3	26.8	–
2023	not published	1,913	6,133	23,017	2,352	9.8	83.1	33.4	–
2022	not published	2,567	8,229	33,255	3,320	10.0	77.2	29.8	–
2021	not published	2,578	8,265	37,345	3,807	9.8	69.0	28.6	–
2020	not published	3,006	9,638	45,704	4,698	9.7	65.8	27.2	–
2019	not published	2,575	8,254	36,128	8,029	4.5	71.3	64.0	–
2018	not published	3,329	10,673	41,350	6,138	6.7	80.5	34.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	O.H. Meling Tankers KS	31.3	7.95	+293%	1,532 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	O.H. Meling Tankers KS	26.8	8.06	+233%	1,624 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	33.4	8.44	+296%	1,680 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	29.8	8.51	+250%	1,824 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	28.6	8.86	+223%	1,642 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	27.2	9.03	+201%	1,700 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	64.0	8.83	+625%	1,886 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	34.7	8.86	+292%	1,688 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.