Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

AMFITRITI

IMO: 9419369
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 76,691 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 76,691 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

148

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−24%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,521 t

CO₂ emitted

7,927 t

8,051 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,000 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,311 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 148 kg/nm · median 129 (+15%)

76.1Ranks 1,154 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 10.7 (+21%)

8.0Faster than 99% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−24%)

4.51Ranks 465 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU28%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU8%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,266 t).

Fuel burned laden

2,072 t

82% of all fuel; 18% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

596 t

7.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+124 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AMFITRITI
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AMFITRITI
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AMFITRITI
Oil tanker median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.7 kn	−6%	+19%	−28%	+4%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	−6%	−18%	−25%	+2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−1%	+5%	+106%	−25%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	−1.2 kn	+3%	−7%	−34%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+23%	−27%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	2,521	7,927	17,000	1,311	13.0	148	6.08	82%
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	3,694	11,589	23,475	2,284	10.3	157	5.87	74%
2023	not published	5,215	16,514	31,158	2,641	11.8	167	5.78	83%
2022	not published	2,541	8,075	15,100	1,348	11.2	168	7.66	65%
2020	not published	3,737	11,828	22,899	1,849	12.4	163	6.54	–
2019	not published	3,197	10,042	18,597	1,538	12.1	172	8.97	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	6.08	7.95	−24%	465 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	5.87	8.06	−27%	449 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	5.78	8.44	−32%	381 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	7.66	8.51	−10%	822 of 1,961	ABS	A
2020	not published	6.54	9.03	−28%	464 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	8.97	8.83	+2%	988 of 1,919	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.