Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

DREPANOS

IMO: 9420643
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 56,702 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: World Tankers Management Pte

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,702 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

123

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−15%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,523 t

CO₂ emitted

17,339 t

17,610 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

45,102 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,210 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 123 kg/nm · median 129 (−5%)

76.1Ranks 719 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.0Faster than 49% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.78 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−15%)

4.51Ranks 604 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU30%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU7%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,273 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,209 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+271 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DREPANOS
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DREPANOS
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DREPANOS
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	+14%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−8%	−10%	+15%	−17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.3 kn	−7%	+17%	+62%	+29%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+5%	−15%	−35%	−22%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−19%	−13%	+19%	+3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	+5%	+55%	−32%	−24%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+7%	+45%	+61%	+38%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	World Tankers Management Pte	5,523	17,339	45,102	4,210	10.7	123	6.78	–
2024	World Tankers Management Pte	4,927	15,462	39,446	3,736	10.6	125	7.45	–
2023	not published	4,615	14,528	34,175	3,147	10.9	135	8.93	–
2022	not published	3,066	9,658	21,095	2,452	8.6	145	6.90	–
2021	not published	4,531	14,284	32,659	3,076	10.6	139	8.86	–
2020	not published	4,701	14,817	27,526	2,764	10.0	171	8.61	–
2019	not published	6,615	20,897	40,658	6,038	6.7	163	11.4	–
2018	not published	3,834	12,138	25,291	5,095	5.0	152	8.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	World Tankers Management Pte	6.78	7.95	−15%	604 of 1,665	DNV	B
2024	World Tankers Management Pte	7.45	8.06	−8%	770 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	8.93	8.44	+6%	978 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	6.90	8.51	−19%	663 of 1,961	DNV	B
2021	not published	8.86	8.86	+0%	895 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	8.61	9.03	−5%	873 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	11.4	8.83	+29%	1,290 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.21	8.86	−7%	790 of 1,779	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.