Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BBC GREENLAND

IMO: 9427079
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John´S

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

70.3

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+100%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

58.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+129%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,773 t

CO₂ emitted

5,556 t

5,643 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,205 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,025 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+100%)

17.4Ranks 2,282 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 9.3 (+33%)

6.9Faster than 93% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 58.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+129%)

10.2Ranks 2,494 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU25%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU7%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,849 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

388 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+87 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BBC GREENLAND
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BBC GREENLAND
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BBC GREENLAND
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+14%	+9%	−31%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+6%	+3%	+5,851%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.6 kn	−3%	+33%	−97%	–	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.1 kn	−4%	−27%	−46%	–	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+70%	+259%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−4%	+6%	−15%	+10%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+6%	+37%	+126%	+9%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	1,773	5,556	25,205	2,025	12.4	70.3	–	–
2024	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	2,247	7,034	36,359	2,814	12.9	61.8	–	–
2023	not published	36	111	611	46	13.4	58.4	–	–
2022	not published	1,322	4,141	22,088	2,246	9.8	59.9	–	–
2021	not published	2,568	8,117	41,176	3,200	12.9	62.4	159	–
2020	not published	1,465	4,626	24,259	1,914	12.7	60.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,804	5,648	28,601	2,503	11.4	63.1	–	–
2018	not published	752	2,354	12,675	1,428	8.9	59.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	58.5	25.5	+129%	2,494 of 2,723	DNV	B
2024	Winter MPP GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	159	159	−0%	36 of 72	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	44.4	24.5	+81%	1,018 of 1,167	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	40.3	25.0	+62%	934 of 1,154	Korean Register	B
2018	not published	36.9	24.9	+48%	798 of 1,044	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.