Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

DACIL

IMO: 9427445
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,259 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 27.08 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,259 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.6

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

72.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+817%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,827 t

CO₂ emitted

5,739 t

5,829 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,159 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,821 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.6 kg/nm · median 129 (−41%)

76.1Ranks 163 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 10.7 (−20%)

8.0Faster than 13% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 72.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+817%)

4.51Ranks 1,652 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports66%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU34%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,970 t

34.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+90 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DACIL
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DACIL
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DACIL
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+13%	+10%	+8%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−18%	−18%	−0%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+7%	+12%	+4%	+8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+16%	+2%	−3%	−5%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−6%	+0%	−4%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−13%	−4%	+29%	+8%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	1,827	5,739	24,159	2,821	8.6	75.6	72.9	–
2024	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	1,504	4,724	22,434	2,555	8.8	67.1	67.5	–
2023	not published	1,850	5,843	22,531	2,592	8.7	82.1	82.1	–
2022	not published	1,661	5,257	21,738	2,612	8.3	76.4	76.0	–
2021	not published	1,472	4,661	22,445	2,350	9.5	65.6	79.7	–
2020	not published	1,626	5,147	23,347	2,604	9.0	69.6	81.7	–
2019	not published	1,451	4,562	18,143	2,215	8.2	80.0	75.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	72.9	7.95	+817%	1,652 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Distribuidora Maritima Petrogas, S.L.U.	67.5	8.06	+738%	1,773 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	82.1	8.44	+873%	1,792 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	76.0	8.51	+793%	1,941 of 1,961	Korean Register	B
2021	not published	79.7	8.86	+800%	1,785 of 1,789	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	81.7	9.03	+804%	1,864 of 1,870	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	75.9	8.83	+760%	1,904 of 1,919	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.