Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BEAUTRITON

IMO: 9428669
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

35.6

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

19.22

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.46 (−25%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

General cargo median 9.4 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,421 t

CO₂ emitted

4,459 t

4,529 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

39,880 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,580 h

149 days, 41% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,707 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 35.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+1%)

17.4Ranks 1,370 of 2,707, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 9.4 (+18%)

7.0Faster than 81% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.22 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.46 (−25%)

10.14Ranks 750 of 2,707, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU31%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU3%

45% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,016 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

120 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+70 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BEAUTRITON
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BEAUTRITON
General cargo median

9.09.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BEAUTRITON
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−14%	−14%	+8%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+3%	+1%	+34%	+9%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+6%	+11%	−40%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+5%	−1%	+21%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+4%	+4%	−29%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−13%	−10%	+6%	+3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+6%	+2%	−0%	+61%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	1,421	4,459	39,880	3,580	11.1	35.6	–	–
2024	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	1,528	4,899	36,771	3,331	11.0	41.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,099	3,522	27,423	2,413	11.4	40.1	–	–
2022	not published	1,730	5,546	45,511	4,237	10.7	38.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,360	4,359	37,491	3,288	11.4	36.3	–	–
2020	not published	1,849	5,899	52,803	4,666	11.3	35.0	–	–
2019	not published	2,009	6,294	49,968	4,597	10.9	40.2	–	–
2018	not published	1,902	5,954	49,993	4,439	11.3	38.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	19.22	25.46	−25%	750 of 2,707	DNV	B
2024	Vertom Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	25.43	19.25	+32%	795 of 1,111	DNV	B
2023	not published	23.38	20.67	+13%	635 of 1,045	DNV	B
2022	not published	24.89	21.57	+15%	633 of 1,034	DNV	B
2021	not published	28.39	22.70	+25%	829 of 1,142	DNV	B
2020	not published	27.88	24.50	+14%	733 of 1,167	DNV	B
2019	not published	26.95	24.96	+8%	650 of 1,154	DNV	B
2018	not published	16.69	24.89	−33%	234 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.