Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOC NIKE

IMO: 9431032
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,091 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: NIKE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: K-Ships Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,091 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

49.4

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

51.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+241%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,064 t

CO₂ emitted

6,616 t

6,717 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,743 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,009 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−38%)

52.8Ranks 101 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 11.1 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+241%)

7.93Ranks 1,388 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU3%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU12%

96% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,355 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	+1%	−8%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	−12%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+11%	+4%	−6%	−10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	−6%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	−3%	+24%	+5%	−6%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−10%	+3%	+23%	−8%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	K-Ships Srl	2,064	6,616	41,743	4,009	10.4	49.4	51.28	–
2024	K-Ships Srl	2,242	7,187	45,141	4,364	10.3	49.7	53.75	–
2023	not published	2,668	8,532	51,331	5,118	10.0	52.0	50.22	–
2022	not published	2,648	8,463	49,614	4,898	10.1	53.4	52.28	–
2021	not published	2,536	8,007	52,677	4,889	10.8	48.1	58.23	–
2020	not published	2,848	8,993	55,922	5,207	10.7	50.9	46.95	–
2019	not published	2,799	8,847	53,268	6,359	8.4	52.5	50.18	–
2018	not published	2,534	8,008	43,371	5,929	7.3	58.4	54.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	K-Ships Srl	51.28	15.04	+241%	1,388 of 1,460	DNV	A
2024	K-Ships Srl	53.75	16.73	+221%	1,213 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	50.22	16.23	+209%	1,234 of 1,314	DNV	A
2022	not published	52.28	16.06	+226%	1,350 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	58.23	16.69	+249%	1,296 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	46.95	16.16	+191%	1,225 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	50.18	17.32	+190%	1,238 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	54.46	17.14	+218%	1,222 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.