Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NORJARL

IMO: 9436264
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Haugesund
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARRIVA SHIPPING AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

30.3

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−4%)

Average speed

8.9 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

6.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,407 t

CO₂ emitted

4,512 t

4,581 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,425 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,210 h

217 days, 59% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 30.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (−14%)

17.4Ranks 1,174 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 9.3 (−4%)

6.9Faster than 39% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−4%)

10.2Ranks 1,250 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,512 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

246 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+69 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORJARL
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORJARL
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

NORJARL
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−12%	−21%	+16%	−30%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−0%	−4%	−20%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−1%	+9%	−1%	+15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−5%	+1%	+5%	−4%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+11%	+7%	−9%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	+2%	+20%	+12%	−26%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ARRIVA SHIPPING AS	1,407	4,512	46,425	5,210	8.9	30.3	–	–
2024	ARRIVA SHIPPING AS	1,385	4,439	39,973	4,041	9.9	34.6	–	–
2023	not published	1,726	5,534	49,733	4,888	10.2	34.7	–	–
2022	not published	1,755	5,625	50,066	5,411	9.3	35.0	–	–
2021	not published	1,761	5,645	47,601	5,497	8.7	37.0	–	–
2020	not published	1,748	5,604	52,272	5,852	8.9	33.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,527	4,894	46,788	6,072	7.7	32.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ARRIVA SHIPPING AS	24.5	25.5	−4%	1,250 of 2,723	DNV	B
2024	ARRIVA SHIPPING AS	34.7	19.3	+80%	970 of 1,111	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	36.7	20.7	+78%	918 of 1,045	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	31.8	21.6	+47%	801 of 1,034	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	33.0	22.7	+46%	928 of 1,142	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	38.0	24.5	+55%	951 of 1,167	DNV	C
2019	not published	51.3	25.0	+105%	1,017 of 1,154	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.