Navalyze · Other · Ship

CS TRUST

IMO: 9438511
Type: Other ship types
Average cargo carried: 8,871 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STAR TRUST

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,871 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

125

Other median 87.2 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

44.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.7 (−49%)

Average speed

18.2 kn

Other median 10.4 kn (+75%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,383 t

CO₂ emitted

4,315 t

4,383 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,053 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

606 h

25 days, 7% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 125 kg/nm · median 87.2 (+44%)

47.6Ranks 116 of 159, lowest first161

Average speedThis ship 18.2 kn · median 10.4 (+75%)

5.8Faster than 99% of other ships13.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 44.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.7 (−49%)

30.8Ranks 40 of 159, lowest first600

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU21%
Into the EU75%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,240 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

144 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+68 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CS TRUST
Other median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CS TRUST
Other median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CS TRUST
Other median

0.050.0100150200

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+2%	+13%	−15%	–	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+2%	−1%	+16%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+7%	+0%	+21%	−12%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−1%	+3%	−84%	+30%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+7%	+17%	+3%	−6%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−17%	−20%	+206%	−49%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	−2%	−11%	−85%	–	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,383	4,315	11,053	606	18.2	125	44.0	–
2024	BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,596	4,975	12,954	788	16.4	123	–	–
2023	not published	1,349	4,207	11,152	661	16.9	121	85.0	–
2022	not published	1,043	3,287	9,210	512	18.0	113	96.3	–
2021	not published	6,749	21,281	59,068	3,397	17.4	114	73.8	–
2020	not published	6,126	19,321	57,514	3,606	16.0	107	78.3	–
2019	not published	2,421	7,553	18,806	1,147	16.4	129	155	–
2018	not published	16,624	51,924	126,216	7,030	18.0	132	2.62	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	44.0	86.7	−49%	40 of 159	ClassNK	B+C
2024	BRIGHT STAR SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	85.0	93.5	−9%	54 of 116	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	96.3	74.1	+30%	46 of 78	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	73.8	55.0	+34%	130 of 158	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	78.3	59.1	+33%	111 of 149	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	155	62.6	+147%	135 of 147	ClassNK	B+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.