Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

AFRODITI

IMO: 9452880
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 77,304 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,304 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

203

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+4%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,624 t

CO₂ emitted

11,405 t

11,583 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,840 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,019 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 129 (+58%)

76.1Ranks 1,543 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 10.7 (−18%)

8.0Faster than 15% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+4%)

4.51Ranks 887 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU31%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU14%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,682 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,982 t

55% of all fuel; 45% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,609 t

14.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+178 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AFRODITI
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AFRODITI
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AFRODITI
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+30%	+11%	−36%	+22%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−14%	−23%	+186%	−29%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+11%	+14%	−82%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+0%	−8%	+44%	+12%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	−10%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.5 kn	−2%	+23%	+4%	−48%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+7%	−3%	+163%	+26%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	3,624	11,405	17,840	2,019	8.8	203	8.27	55%
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	4,364	13,622	27,942	2,701	10.3	156	6.79	69%
2023	not published	1,774	5,612	9,781	846	11.6	181	9.53	43%
2022	not published	8,681	27,439	53,292	4,708	11.3	163	7.58	50%
2021	not published	6,016	19,024	37,088	3,011	12.3	162	6.75	65%
2020	not published	6,878	21,741	41,016	3,263	12.6	168	5.24	–
2019	not published	6,702	20,940	39,349	3,896	10.1	170	10.1	–
2018	not published	2,386	7,452	14,966	1,340	11.2	159	8.00	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	8.27	7.95	+4%	887 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	LIQUIMAR TANKERS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.	6.79	8.06	−16%	629 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	9.53	8.44	+13%	1,058 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	7.58	8.51	−11%	808 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	6.75	8.86	−24%	546 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	5.24	9.03	−42%	243 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	10.1	8.83	+14%	1,157 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	8.00	8.86	−10%	749 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.