Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LONE

IMO: 9458913
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 536 t
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 24.62 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“ · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 536 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

288.0 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

4.1 kn

Fuel per day at sea

28.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,086 t

CO₂ emitted

16,306 t

16,555 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,659 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,339 h

181 days, 50% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 122.7 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+69%)

42.2Ranks 162 of 189, lowest first142.3

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 11.1 (+43%)

8.5Faster than 94% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 130.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.55 (+153%)

21.30Ranks 136 of 189, lowest first306.29

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU7%

26% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,277 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LONE
General cargo median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LONE
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LONE
General cargo median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−11.8 kn	+135%	−40%	−13%	–	11.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 135%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+10%	+10%	+11%	−52%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+7.1 kn	−31%	+26%	−40%	–	7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−6.8 kn	+72%	−3%	+84%	–	6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 72%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−32%	−30%	−42%	−23%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+16%	+16%	+118%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−10%	−1%	−68%	−36%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	3,752	12,028	13,355	3,214	4.2	280.9	1,383.19	–
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	5,086	16,306	17,659	4,339	4.1	288.0	1,721.22	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	2,490	7,826	20,300	1,277	15.9	122.7	130.22	–
2023	not published	2,032	6,438	18,214	1,150	15.8	111.6	271.23	–
2022	not published	4,876	15,537	30,350	3,475	8.7	160.7	734.71	–
2021	not published	1,543	4,873	16,492	1,063	15.5	93.6	–	–
2020	not published	3,870	12,397	28,300	1,878	15.1	136.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,534	4,835	12,981	860	15.1	118.2	–	–
2018	not published	5,255	16,548	40,195	2,907	13.8	130.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2025	SAL Ship Management UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS „LONE“	130.22	51.55	+153%	136 of 189	EnvService	C
2023	not published	271.23	93.54	+190%	101 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	37.53	22.70	+65%	986 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	48.67	24.50	+99%	1,047 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	40.95	24.96	+64%	939 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	64.04	24.89	+157%	956 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.