Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TAN BINH 299

IMO
9459149
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.58 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
IVS KINGLET

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fairmont Shipping Singapore

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
67.7
General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+92%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
9.53
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.46 (−63%)
Average speed
12.0 kn
General cargo median 9.4 kn (+28%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,588 t
CO₂ emitted
4,992 t
5,070 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
23,467 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,959 h
82 days, 22% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,707 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.7 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+92%)
17.4Ranks 2,209 of 2,707, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 9.4 (+28%)
7.0Faster than 89% of general cargo ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 9.53 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.46 (−63%)
10.14Ranks 230 of 2,707, lowest first52.37
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports9%
  • From the EU22%
  • Into the EU66%
  • At berth in the EU3%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
130 t
2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+78 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • TAN BINH 299
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • TAN BINH 299
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • TAN BINH 299
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn−8%−11%−14%−13%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+2.8 kn+5%+36%+79%−20%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+3.5 kn−1%+57%+123%–3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.5 kn−12%−44%−6%–3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.3 kn+9%−4%−85%+21%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.7 kn−6%+43%+137%+4%3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.9 kn+12%−20%−45%+11%2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearFairmont Shipping Singapore1,5884,99223,4671,95912.067.7––
2025Tan Binh Co Ltd1,5884,99223,4671,95912.067.7––
2024ISLAND VIEW SHIPPING SERVICES2,0186,31327,3932,20612.473.7––
2023not published1,0743,36815,2991,5969.670.2––
2022not published4861,5176,8521,1296.171.013.34–
2021not published5901,8607,3017649.680.813.13–
2020not published3,52611,01347,6614,38410.974.010.89–
2019not published1,5774,93820,0792,8027.278.610.49–
2018not published2,5798,06636,8013,65510.170.19.41–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearFairmont Shipping Singapore––––VerifaviaA
2025Tan Binh Co Ltd9.5325.46−63%230 of 2,707ClassNKB+C
2024ISLAND VIEW SHIPPING SERVICES10.9619.25−43%286 of 1,111VerifaviaA
2023not published13.7820.67−33%289 of 1,045VerifaviaA
2022not published––––VerifaviaA
2021not published13.138.57+53%2,915 of 3,466VerifaviaA
2020not published10.898.24+32%2,359 of 3,150VerifaviaA
2019not published10.498.38+25%2,372 of 3,360VerifaviaA
2018not published9.418.50+11%2,013 of 3,384VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

TAN BINH 299 (IMO 9459149): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze