Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NUNALIK

IMO: 9466996
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

53.1

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

25.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−1%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+34%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,518 t

CO₂ emitted

4,773 t

4,847 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,585 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,281 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 53.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+51%)

17.4Ranks 1,928 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 9.3 (+34%)

6.9Faster than 94% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 25.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−1%)

10.2Ranks 1,329 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU38%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,654 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

154 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+74 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NUNALIK
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NUNALIK
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

NUNALIK
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+0%	−2%	−13%	−31%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−3%	+3%	−4%	+40%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+5%	+11%	+76%	+17%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−7%	−12%	−8%	+13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+2%	−1%	−5%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	−7%	+9%	−21%	−8%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	−7%	−17%	−16%	+3%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,518	4,773	28,585	2,281	12.5	53.1	–	–
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,744	5,464	32,985	2,557	12.9	52.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,871	5,846	34,479	2,831	12.2	54.3	–	–
2022	not published	1,012	3,193	19,631	1,699	11.6	51.5	–	–
2021	not published	1,178	3,729	21,340	1,731	12.3	55.2	–	–
2020	not published	1,213	3,801	22,499	1,764	12.8	53.9	–	–
2019	not published	1,657	5,216	28,659	2,623	10.9	57.8	–	–
2018	not published	2,129	6,684	34,090	2,784	12.2	62.4	36.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	25.2	25.5	−1%	1,329 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	36.6	19.3	+90%	979 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	26.1	20.7	+26%	729 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	22.3	21.6	+3%	545 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.8	22.7	−13%	431 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	20.1	24.5	−18%	370 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	21.9	25.0	−12%	430 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	21.3	24.9	−15%	382 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.