Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CDRY BROWN

IMO: 9469302
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,227 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Naples
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,227 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

42.2

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

32.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+25%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,579 t

CO₂ emitted

5,062 t

5,139 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,442 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,476 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 42.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+20%)

17.4Ranks 1,656 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 9.3 (+16%)

6.9Faster than 76% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 32.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+25%)

10.2Ranks 1,898 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU13%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU13%

90% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,562 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

664 t

13.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+77 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	+11%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+7%	+2%	−23%	+48%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	+28%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−1%	+9%	−16%	−9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+0%	−5%	+21%	+4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−2%	+34%	+3%	−1%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	−15%	−39%	+11%	–	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,579	5,062	37,442	3,476	10.8	42.2	32.0	–
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,596	5,117	33,749	3,178	10.6	47.3	42.3	–
2023	not published	1,941	6,224	43,763	3,931	11.1	44.4	28.5	–
2022	not published	1,487	4,766	34,193	3,080	11.1	43.5	31.1	–
2021	not published	1,783	5,715	40,741	4,033	10.1	43.8	34.2	–
2020	not published	1,470	4,712	33,576	3,180	10.6	43.8	33.0	100%
2019	not published	1,446	4,528	32,522	4,170	7.8	44.5	33.2	–
2018	not published	1,525	4,777	29,304	2,664	11.0	52.1	0.91	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	32.0	25.5	+25%	1,898 of 2,723	RINA	B
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	42.3	19.3	+120%	1,020 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	28.5	20.7	+38%	797 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	31.1	21.6	+44%	784 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	34.2	22.7	+51%	944 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	33.0	24.5	+35%	871 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	33.2	25.0	+33%	831 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.