Navalyze · Other · Ship

XIN HAI TONG 501

IMO: 9474371
Type: Other ship types
Average cargo carried: 520 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Former names: EMMA, INDUSTRIAL EMMA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “EMMA” · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 520 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

44.9 kg/nm

Other median 87.2 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

271

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.69 (+213%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Other median 10.4 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

859 t

CO₂ emitted

2,697 t

2,740 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,123 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,933 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 44.9 kg/nm · median 87.2 (−49%)

47.6Ranks 13 of 159, lowest first160.7

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 10.4 (−5%)

5.8Faster than 38% of other ships13.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 271.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.69 (+213%)

30.78Ranks 128 of 159, lowest first600.46

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU57%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU6%

22% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (606 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

XIN HAI TONG 501
Other median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

XIN HAI TONG 501
Other median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

XIN HAI TONG 501
Other median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−26%	−34%	−8%	+254%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+8%	+11%	+195%	+47%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	−28%	−12%	+876%	–	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+40%	+13%	−98%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	+6%	+24%	−7%	–	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−6%	+11%	+137%	–	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−2%	−5%	−26%	−54%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “EMMA”	502	1,577	9,681	1,066	9.1	51.9	158.47	–
2025	Fujian Dasong International ship management Co., Ltd	859	2,697	19,123	1,933	9.9	44.9	271.13	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “EMMA”	1,254	3,935	20,735	1,869	11.1	60.5	76.55	–
2023	not published	394	1,237	7,028	650	10.8	56.0	51.94	–
2022	not published	56	180	720	82	8.8	77.8	115.34	–
2021	not published	1,634	5,164	29,351	2,701	10.9	55.7	91.52	–
2020	not published	1,662	5,228	31,591	3,402	9.3	52.6	–	–
2019	not published	751	2,349	13,349	1,720	7.8	56.2	–	–
2018	not published	1,032	3,226	18,027	2,244	8.0	57.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “EMMA”	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2025	Fujian Dasong International ship management Co., Ltd	271.13	86.69	+213%	128 of 159	China Classification Society	A
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “EMMA”	76.55	51.55	+48%	113 of 189	EnvService	A
2023	not published	51.94	93.54	−44%	34 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2019	not published	74.20	24.96	+197%	1,093 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	161.87	24.89	+550%	1,015 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.