Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SKYLGE

IMO: 9508809
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Harlingen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Skylge Shipping BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

38.8

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−21%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,632 t

CO₂ emitted

5,206 t

5,286 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,029 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,057 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 38.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+10%)

17.4Ranks 1,511 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 9.3 (+12%)

6.9Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 20.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−21%)

10.2Ranks 828 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports48%
From the EU17%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,847 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

216 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+80 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SKYLGE
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SKYLGE
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SKYLGE
General cargo median

17.520.022.525.027.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−16%	−11%	−17%	−14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	+9%	−12%	−21%	+16%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	−0%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+1%	−6%	−11%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−6%	−1%	+6%	−9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−1%	+6%	+10%	+3%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−8%	+2%	+9%	−11%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Skylge Shipping BV	1,632	5,206	42,029	4,057	10.4	38.8	–	–
2024	Skylge Shipping BV	2,340	7,381	50,824	5,166	9.8	46.0	27.4	–
2023	not published	2,728	8,606	64,468	5,296	12.2	42.3	–	–
2022	not published	2,889	9,182	64,744	5,320	12.2	44.6	27.3	–
2021	not published	3,188	10,059	72,515	5,551	13.1	44.0	–	–
2020	not published	3,202	10,135	68,311	5,479	12.5	46.9	–	–
2019	not published	2,922	9,219	61,937	5,326	11.6	47.2	–	–
2018	not published	2,892	9,172	56,642	5,324	10.6	51.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Skylge Shipping BV	20.1	25.5	−21%	828 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Skylge Shipping BV	23.2	19.3	+21%	720 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	20.0	20.7	−3%	495 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2021	not published	22.8	22.7	+0%	578 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2020	not published	25.2	24.5	+3%	609 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	24.3	25.0	−2%	542 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2018	not published	27.5	24.9	+10%	600 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.