Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NADINE V

IMO: 9512563
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 71,794 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Klip Marine Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,794 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

126

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (−30%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

802 t

CO₂ emitted

2,528 t

2,567 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,367 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

621 h

26 days, 7% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 126 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+53%)

61.0Ranks 3,337 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 35% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−30%)

4.80Ranks 650 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU17%
Into the EU81%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

46 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+39 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NADINE V
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NADINE V
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NADINE V
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	−4.3 kn	+4%	−39%	−26%	–	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	−20%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.1 kn	−12%	+108%	+14%	−8%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.2 kn	+5%	−52%	+131%	+45%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Klip Marine Shipmanagement Ltd	802	2,528	6,367	621	10.2	126	5.53	–
2025	Cloud Ship Management DMCC	802	2,528	6,367	621	10.2	126	5.53	–
2024	Klip Marine Shipmanagement Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	2,270	7,163	18,017	2,910	6.2	126	5,807,735	–
2021	not published	2,960	9,308	24,420	2,321	10.5	121	7.33	–
2020	not published	3,504	11,037	30,425	2,874	10.6	115	8.89	49%
2019	not published	3,505	11,044	26,705	5,959	4.5	131	9.68	–
2018	not published	1,447	4,553	11,539	1,191	9.7	125	6.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Klip Marine Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Cloud Ship Management DMCC	5.53	7.90	−30%	650 of 3,611	RINA	A
2024	Klip Marine Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2021	not published	7.33	8.57	−14%	1,140 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	8.89	8.24	+8%	1,830 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	9.68	8.38	+16%	2,167 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	6.69	8.50	−21%	917 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.