Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

JAG LAKSHYA

IMO: 9516117
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 91,199 t
Port of registry: Mumbai
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 91,199 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

181.4

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.23

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−22%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,433 t

CO₂ emitted

13,887 t

14,105 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,442 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,172 h

91 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 181.4 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+41%)

76.1Ranks 1,444 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.7 (+6%)

8.0Faster than 67% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.23 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−22%)

4.51Ranks 486 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU35%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU4%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,089 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

503 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+218 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JAG LAKSHYA
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JAG LAKSHYA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JAG LAKSHYA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	−1%	+13%	+65%	+23%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	+9%	−14%	+44%	−19%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+11%	+15%	+5%	−4%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−10%	−12%	−62%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	+0.9 kn	−6%	+2%	+603%	−37%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.9 kn	−3%	+47%	−88%	+96%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	4,433	13,887	24,442	2,172	11.3	181.4	6.23	–
2024	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	2,713	8,491	14,810	1,506	9.8	183.2	5.07	–
2023	not published	1,729	5,403	10,296	822	12.5	167.9	6.23	–
2022	not published	1,495	4,690	9,852	820	12.0	151.8	6.48	–
2021	not published	4,330	13,560	25,653	2,098	12.2	168.8	5.89	–
2019	not published	653	2,046	3,648	324	11.3	179.0	9.28	–
2018	not published	5,620	17,588	30,353	4,098	7.4	185.1	4.73	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	6.23	7.95	−22%	486 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.	5.07	8.06	−37%	311 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	6.23	8.44	−26%	483 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	6.48	8.51	−24%	571 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	5.89	8.86	−34%	390 of 1,789	DNV	C
2019	not published	9.28	8.83	+5%	1,034 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	4.73	8.86	−47%	229 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.