Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FRISIAN OCTA

IMO: 9526095
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Sneek
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BEAUFORCE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Boomsma Shipping BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

46.0

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+31%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

19.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−23%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

246 t

CO₂ emitted

769 t

781 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,339 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

557 h

23 days, 6% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 46.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+31%)

17.4Ranks 1,794 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 9.3 (+3%)

6.9Faster than 56% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−23%)

10.2Ranks 792 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU0%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU5%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (523 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

37 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+12 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRISIAN OCTA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRISIAN OCTA
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FRISIAN OCTA
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+19%	+15%	−82%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	+64%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	+40%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	−27%	+42%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+6%	−4%	−62%	−14%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+4%	+13%	+33%	−9%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.1 kn	−6%	+35%	+137%	+55%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	246	769	5,339	557	9.6	46.0	–	–
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	1,164	3,645	30,177	3,033	9.9	38.6	37.5	–
2023	not published	735	2,298	18,444	1,817	10.2	39.9	38.9	–
2022	not published	564	1,768	13,160	1,301	10.1	42.9	35.4	–
2021	not published	746	2,367	17,942	1,770	10.1	41.6	26.5	–
2020	not published	1,855	5,816	47,135	4,226	11.2	39.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,344	4,223	35,544	3,454	10.3	37.8	–	–
2018	not published	602	1,887	15,002	2,087	7.2	40.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Boomsma Shipping BV	19.7	25.5	−23%	792 of 2,723	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Boomsma Shipping BV	25.9	19.3	+35%	815 of 1,111	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	32.9	20.7	+59%	876 of 1,045	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	27.4	21.6	+27%	706 of 1,034	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	19.3	22.7	−15%	402 of 1,142	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	22.4	24.5	−9%	480 of 1,167	DNV	B
2019	not published	24.5	25.0	−2%	550 of 1,154	DNV	B
2018	not published	15.8	24.9	−37%	204 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.